Originally Posted by
Nico
I didn't see the game so I can't make any direct judgement on how any player went yesterday, however, when I was looking at the Supercoach points for both sides for the game I saw some quite telling statistics. I know stats lie sometimes and some might dismiss the following, but here goes.
Supercoach Points WB = 1770 Swans = 1530 Difference = 240. the difference being 3.5 players who scored around 70 points. This is apparently what it looked like in the 2nd quarter.
The WB had 8 players who scored below 70 points and that 8's total points were 443. The Swans had "13" players below 70 points for a total of 557 points. WB average is 55 and our average is 43.
The damning stat though is we had 6 players below 50 (total 210) and the WWB had 1(27 Aker). We only had 9 less possessions for the game and our efficiency was 73% and the WB 70%.
Perhaps the story lies in the fact that we had 159 kicks as against their 196 and we had 198 handballs to their 168. Almost an exact reverse. They had 90 marks and we had 66, that figures. It looks like we had too many players happy to take the easy handball option then again it could be added that the WB pressure caused us to treat the ball like a hot potato. Did we overdo the handball and at the same do a very poor job at it.
Do I dare suggest our game plan is or how we play the WB is shizenhousen.
So what about the players under 70 points. In descending order.
Jack - 14 stats, 6 contested possessions, 2 tackles,73% TOG. Maybe didn't get to enough contests.
Moore - 13 possessions, 9 contested, 3 tackles, TOG 76%. Maybe didn't get to enough contests.
Buchanan - 14 possessions, 5 contested, 4 tackles TOG 69%. 8 possessions in the 2nd Q when we got flogged. 6 in the other 3 quarters says he was no where near the contest for much of his time.
Bevan - 17 possessions, 5 contested, 6 tackles, 5 marks all uncontested, 91% TOG. Negating game with some run to space perhaps or was he towelled up by his opponents.
Crouch - 14 stats, 5 contested, 3 tackles TOG 81% (Aker 85%) Clearly a negating role that probably gave us little run off work.
MCveigh - 12 stats all uncontested, no scores. Was he playing a negating role or was he well tagged. TOG 93%.
White - 4 stats, 13 hit outs, 37% TOG. I believe Jolly had a poor game so that doesn't make sense.
Jolly - 12 stats, 29 hitouts, 9 handballs, 3 frees against, 4 clangers, 70% TOG. Strange figures, was there something wrong with him. A howler of a game.
Ablett - 14 stats, 6 in the last Q, 4 clearances (is that right?) 1 tackle, 4 clangers, 3 frees against, TOG 64%. If he had a man he didn't get to close to him. Horrible performance.
LRT - 13 stats, 10 uncontested, no tackles, no clearances, TOG 94%. Oh my gawd, no wonder the WB forwards had a picnic.
Grundy - 7 stats, 3 unc marks and 7 uncontested possessions, 4 tackles, no clearances, 82%TOG. Even worse. A putrid game. Those stats are damning.
Malceski - 8 stats, 6 unc, efficiency 50% (team worst), no clearances, 64% TOG. the 3rd backman who had no clearances. An massive fall from grace.
MOL - 7 stats, 5 unc, 2 clangers. Worst game of his career.
So we had 3 backmen who were useless and 8, yes 8 players you could call run off and link players who you might expect to work through the centre and run to space that didn't appear to get near the footy much at all or slaughtered the footy. It could be said they didn't work anywhere near hard enough when it mattered.
To me this highlights our weaknesses:
2 tall backmen who struggle against quality opposition.
A medium backman who has "lost it".
A midfield that relies on too few players ie. Goodes, ROK, J Bolton and Kirk and the rest are levels below so add little value to the rotations and indeed don't rotate with the fab 4. These 4 had massive TOG, so do we rely too much on these players and undervalue others. I would say when these 4 get possession there are too few link up players/options.
On these stas and they seem to stack up every time we play a top team, as another poster said our bottom 6 maybe just aren't good enough.
So to me it follows that the serial offenders are Buchanan, Ablett, Malceski, Grundy, LRT.
Moore needs to WHAO.
White is continually a wasted asset.
Jolly and McVeigh need to play well every week.
We had these negating mid sized players; Jack, Crouch, Ablett, Bevan, McVeigh(?)
By the way they said in the radio yesterday that Ablett went into the game with a suspect shoulder. Sheesh.
Wayne Schwass said this morning on SEN that we keep having the blue collar tag and are a good average team but when it is time to put on the suit against the silk we fail miserably. Theses stats back it up.
I lot to digest and I throw it out there for comment.
Bookmarks