Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 19 of 19

Thread: Trading list

  1. #13
    Originally posted by Bolton brothers
    I look forward to seeing how he has progressed in the practice matches ( I say that because whispers are that few senior players will be tried in the WC because we have started training relatively late and the concern about the work load on some of them. Bonus is we might get to see a whole lot of young players in the Carlton WC game.)
    One of the criticisms I had of the Eade regime was that some of the draftees seemed to get a raw deal. So I was very pleased when Roos threw McVeigh, Dempster et al into the Wizard Cup last year, and if you're right and he does it again this year I'll be rapt.

    I can't understand why clubs don't take the opportunity to put the spotlight on their youngsters in the pre-season games, even if it's only 5 or 10 minutes just to whet their appetites.

  2. #14
    Carpe Noctem CureTheSane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Knoxfield, Victoria
    Posts
    5,032
    Indeed, Cliff.

    Add to that that we have a team of 22, and you could make an argument that the best performing youngster wins a place in the team every week.
    Just to give them a taste.
    The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

  3. #15
    On the Rookie List
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mackay Qld
    Posts
    7
    Please excuse all the numbers I listed when I compiled my attempt (below) - but they helped me in my assessment.
    Made consideration of age, height and ability/performance as if I was a recruiter for another club - therefore players over a certain age will lose value despite being in good form. Similarly tall players who may ruck are highly sought after so they go higher despite possibly not performing as well as others.

    I am a fan of another AFL team - so you might consider my assessment as unbiased.

    No Height Weight Age Games Player Name
    37 191 95 24.0 109 Goodes, Adam
    1 194 98 26.9 127 Hall, Barry
    2 184 81 23.7 93 Davis, Nick
    36 175 76 19.6 22 Schneider, Adam
    19 188 87 26.8 181 O?Loughlin, Michael
    15 203 103 22.5 18 Doyle, Stephen
    22 192 83 24.2 124 Saddington, Jason
    17 190 83 22.5 50 Kennelly, Tadhg
    12 178 75 23.8 90 Fosdike, Nic
    5 187 89 22.9 42 O?Keefe, Ryan
    24 180 76 23.8 89 Bolton, Jude
    27 200 104 31.1 149 Ball, Jason
    6 188 83 23.6 51 Bolton, Craig
    4 182 84 25.1 108 Mathews, Ben
    30 196 86 20.3 14 Roberts-Thomson, Lewis
    25 192 93 27.1 151 Schauble, Andrew
    43 197 93 19.5 5 Meiklejohn, James
    29 190 76 19.8 5 Powell, Mark
    28 173 77 25.8 130 Crouch, Jared
    9 180 78 22.5 24 Fixter, Ben
    35 188 73 21.0 9 Sundqvist, Jarrad
    21 185 85 26.6 120 Barry, Leo
    31 184 81 27.2 71 Kirk, Brett
    10 176 82 30.7 252 Williams, Paul
    23 184 82 28.6 147 Nicks, Matthew
    11 178 85 31.7 258 Maxfield, Stuart
    18 189 89 23.8 7 James, Heath
    20 182 85 21.1 6 Ablett, Luke
    32 177 80 21.2 6 Buchanan, Amon
    33 188 88 27.5 109 Warfe, Rowan
    Cogito ergo sum

  4. #16
    On the Rookie List BayesysLeftBoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    South of the border
    Posts
    523
    1. Adam Goodes
    2. Barry Hall
    3. Jude Bolton
    4. Michael O?Loughlin
    5. Tadhg Kennelly
    6. Jason Saddington
    7. Adam Schneider
    8. Leo Barry
    9. Craig Bolton
    10. Nick Davis
    11. Ben Mathews
    12. Brett Kirk
    13. Lewis Roberts-Thomson
    14. Nic Fosdike
    15. Ben Fixter
    16. Stephen Doyle
    17. Jared Crouch
    18. Heath James
    19. Mark Powell
    20. Andrew Schauble
    21. Luke Ablett
    22. James Meiklejohn
    23. Ryan O?Keefe
    24. Jason Ball
    25. Jarrad Sundqvist
    26. Amon Buchanan
    27. Stuart Maxfield
    28. Paul Williams
    29. Matthew Nicks
    30. Rowan Warfe

  5. #17
    Originally posted by Foreign

    I am a fan of another AFL team - so you might consider my assessment as unbiased.
    Welcome Foreign.

    Given your "unbiased" status, I'm interested to know why you rated Barry and Kirk so low.

    They both just missed out on AA selection last year, and barring injury each must have at least five years left in their careers.

    I would think that they would be pretty highly rated by Roos?

  6. #18
    On the Rookie List
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mackay Qld
    Posts
    7
    Don't get me wrong here, this list isn't in order of how good I think the players are - its in tradability.

    Both Kirk and Leo are crackers (great) - especially Kirk - who I believe has made the Swans better by making all opposition midfields less effective.

    This is the area that I believe the Swans need most improvement in - midfield - and I think that you have taken two great recruits from this year's draft - Schmidt and Willoughby - these will be great for you but will need 3+ years to develop into top flight midfielders.

    The only reason that I ranked both thes players (Leo and Kirk) so low is age (both about 27 years old) and profile - the midfielder build is the most common - so a team looking for players usually wants talls or KPP - midfielders they usually recruit themselves as kids and develop them therefore not as much market value.
    Cogito ergo sum

  7. #19
    Veteran Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    16,465
    Originally posted by Foreign


    The only reason that I ranked both thes players (Leo and Kirk) so low is age (both about 27 years old) and profile - the midfielder build is the most common - so a team looking for players usually wants talls or KPP - midfielders they usually recruit themselves as kids and develop them therefore not as much market value.
    There are plenty of midfielders who have been high profile trades (or attempted trades) - Nick Stevens, Nathan Brown, Des Headland, Shane Woewodin, Kane Johnson are just a few high profile ones in recent seasons who spring to mind without doing an exhaustive think. And at the next level down (which players like Kirk would probably fit into) there is usually plenty of interest as well.

    Kirk maybe 27 but he probably has the physical capacity to play good footy for another 5 or so years at least. He is supremely fit and doesn't have a history of injury worries.

    Barry isn't a midfielder - he is a medium defender with the ability to play much taller than his height. He also plays with a flair and recklessness rare in players in his position.

    Most teams in the comp would happily take either of them, I reckon.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO