View Poll Results: What should the Swans do?

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
  • Begrudgingly accept pick 48

    20 35.71%
  • Decline the offer and let Lamb enter the draft

    30 53.57%
  • I have no idea

    6 10.71%
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 71

Thread: Jed Lamb trade - Poll

  1. #1
    Carpe Noctem CureTheSane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Knoxfield, Victoria
    Posts
    5,032

    Jed Lamb trade - Poll

    So here's the scenario...

    GWS will not bend and refuse to budge from a pick 48 for Lamb trade.

    What do you think the Swans should do?

    - - - Updated - - -

    For me, it was put really well in another thread...

    Quote Originally Posted by Legs Akimbo View Post
    We just got reamed. We could have elected not to trade either and they would only have been able to take one in the PSD. What trade would we expect for 1st round draft pick with 12 games AND a premier ruckman at the height of his career? I'll say it again, we just got reamed.
    In trying to 'do the right thing for another player (Mumford) we've lost power big time.

    And this is why personalities and friendships and loyalties should always be considered, but not carry any great weight in business transactions.

    As we watch Lamb kicking to Mummy for a goal against the Swans there may be a tinge of regret...
    The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

  2. #2
    Pushing for Selection
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    53
    Not much Swans can do. Not going to get any of GWS first four selections (1,2,21,22) and Swans would want to avoid any selection after GWS 6th selection (75,76,93,111). So at this stage GWS 5th selection (48) seems like the best of a bad situation. Unless the swap gets more complicated with other teams or players added in.

  3. #3
    Draft Scout
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    711
    Don't take it, should have let Mummy go through and make them sweat... These picks are not acceptable and of little use pick 48 would be a rookie promotion at best
    Staying ahead of the game...

  4. #4
    Human CJK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Why
    Posts
    2,170
    Quote Originally Posted by CureTheSane View Post
    As we watch Lamb kicking to Mummy for a goal against the Swans there may be a tinge of regret...
    In the NEAFL
    -

  5. #5
    Proud Tragic Swan Primmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    On the Move!
    Posts
    5,970
    I look at this and think the swans will park this in their memory banks for future dealings with GWS. They are quite well known for doing good deals and doing right by other clubs and by the players that want to move on. Watch this space., Next year it will be a different scenario.
    If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

  6. #6
    Senior Player GongSwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wollongong NSW
    Posts
    1,362
    We might well use the pick. We have now lost 5 listed players and brought in Buddy and Perris on the rookie list. We probably need4 or 5 picks in hte draft
    You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

  7. #7
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Northern Beaches
    Posts
    2,072
    Graciously take 48.

  8. #8
    pr. dim-melb; m not f
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Coast NSW, Costa Lantana
    Posts
    6,889
    Lamb was a first round pick, albeit a late one, and has shown he has a real future. He's worth a lot better than 48, and GWS could give us twentysomething and keep their first pick. But I doubt it will happen.
    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

  9. #9
    Veterans List aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down South
    Posts
    5,681
    Let him enter the PSD. We don't need to be nice to GWS.

  10. #10
    No more Mr Nice Guy.. PSD or a decent pick thanks..

  11. #11
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Northern Beaches
    Posts
    2,072
    Not much point in being a dog in the manger..if he goes in PSD we get zilch. 48 is a lot better than that..

  12. #12
    Carpe Noctem CureTheSane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Knoxfield, Victoria
    Posts
    5,032
    Quote Originally Posted by royboy42 View Post
    Not much point in being a dog in the manger..if he goes in PSD we get zilch. 48 is a lot better than that..
    Well, the point I would make is that if we constantly accept less than what a player is worth, then we won't be regarded as 'fair traders' by the other teams, but as 'patsy's'
    The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO