I believe the passing of time has a lot to do with it.
Many of those most critical of (and virulent towards) tried to contrast the response to him with that towards Winmar and Long, trying to argue that these two were noble crusaders for the cause but Goodes was just an attention seeking whatever. This conveniently ignores the fact that the responses at the time to the famous Winmar and Long incidents were far from uniform at the time. Both copped their share of condemnation from those who argued they were over-reacting. I have read comments from Long about how he received death threats after challenging Monkhurst's vilification.
Now, with the passage of time, the almost universal attitude towards these two is very positive. I expect Goodes' actions will be seen in a similar light in ten, fifteen or twenty years time. (And yes, it is very sad that we may need to wait that long.)
Bookmarks