Then there is a classic sledge: Michael Voss calls out to brother Brett,"My father slept with your mother!" Brett got a behind.
Then there is a classic sledge: Michael Voss calls out to brother Brett,"My father slept with your mother!" Brett got a behind.
He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)
I agree. Just because one or two people with MH issues find it funny, does not make it suddenly non offensive, just as it is inexcusable for a black person to use the 'n' word.......and also because having MH issues does not instantly eliminate one from being a d**khead bogan, if that's what they happen to be. You would think having MH issues would give people empathy towards others facing the same plight, apparently that is not the case, as we've witnessed here......
- - - Updated - - -
Now that IS funny!!
From my experience online those who put disclaimers on their @@@@ty tirades are really just putting up a front to excuse their @@@@ty opinions and 3/4 it didnt happen.
"i am not racist but.."
"How could i be racist when i know black people..anyway we need to do someothing abut blacks"
etc etc
right here! I hated them then. I hate them now. I'll hate them forever. It has nothing to with the pseudo, manufactured rivalry. It's to do with the rediculous advantages they've been given. I'd hate The GC Suns for the same reason, but they botched theirs. I have a little bit of sympathy for them ... at the moment.
I hate Collingwood because they have traditionally stolen players from weaker clubs (we've been a big victim) and similarly Carlton.
I hate Hawthorn because of a few core group of dirty players ... and a mass of feral supporters.
The rest I don't really hate (it's a strong word). But I'll never like them ... simply because they're not Sydney.
Last edited by goswannies; 13th September 2016 at 05:38 PM. Reason: M
Mummy's sorry he got busted.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
It was obvious from the start that the league wanted a 'healthy rivalry' in Sydney to capture the 'imaginations' of a traditional non footy market, hence the love and endless gifts to the Giants, but now, at least since Buddy has arrived, their agenda seems to have hardened into making GWS the strongest team in Sydney. It's just yet another method (besides changing the rules, umpires, stadium contracts, MRP, etc), this vengeful league can use to teach us a lesson for being too successful (within the rules!). When will they be satisfied, or will the corruption and hate go on forever?
The publicity over this (and the unwarranted publicity over the standard AFL request re concussion test on Kennedy) has conveniently overrun virtually any questioning of Mumford escaping a charge on his sling tackle of Tippett.
Pretty well agree with you Barry..the Mummy comment was immature and a bit schoolboyish. He has been advised of that and squared up with Bud. Both men enough to move on.
And I too took slight offence at the 'older men' comment. I'll not see 70 again and hope that my '50s machismo atitude has waned.
Funnily enough in the article on AFL website about Mumford's 'apology' to Franklin re the sledge, it also refers to Mumford's tackle and says the following:
"Mumford also came under Match Review Panel attention for a tackle that saw Swans ruckman Kurt Tippett's head strike the turf, but he was cleared of an illegal sling."
Someone forgot the official line!
Bookmarks