Have you read mine. "They train, they live exactly the same but get paid less" they are in exactly the same situation. Contract wise it could have easily been a one year contract for anyone taken after round 5 or 6. We used to have lists of 52 then they were reduced as stand alone reserves disappeared, which is fair. Players taken late in the draft had pay parity then. E.g chris grant taken at pick 105. Now we've gone full circle n back to larger lists with stand alone reserves with Cat A rookie players only being rookie by name. No pay parity. I'm surprised no1 can see this. They are basically main listed players getting underpaid.
Bookmarks