Page 53 of 198 FirstFirst ... 34349505152535455565763103153 ... LastLast
Results 625 to 636 of 2366

Thread: 2022 List management, trading, drafting

  1. #625
    Veterans List Ludwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    9,324
    I was going through Freo's team as a preview for this Saturday's game and noted the interesting sources of their list development. They have done very well extracting players from a variety of places, which is something we've been generally good at.

    Picking out just one example is Freo taking Taberner in 2013 as a 20 yo and Shultz in 2018 as a 21 yo. Both were 4th round picks. Taberner didn't really get going until his 8th year in 2020. It's a long time to stay on a list as a depth player. Maybe Hayden McLean (who I mistakenly left out of my drafted players list) will turn out to be such a player.

    Robbie Fox is one overager who has worked out for us. I suppose we can put Lloyd and Papley in that category, both rookie drafted as 19 yos.

    There seem to be a lot of success stories of late by drafting overagers. Excellent value for money. I'm not sure this is the year for us to tap this market, having 3 top 40 draft picks. Mutaz El Nour was in the sights of many, but surprisingly didn't get taken in the mid-season draft. He would be someone of interest from the 2nd round forward.

    On a separate matter, I compared the stats for Cam Zurhaar and Will Hayward. They are quite close statistically and if anything, Hayward would be ahead. Yet it's interesting that the perception of many on here would be that Zurhaar would be an upgrade on Hayward. I was one of those, but am now having a rethink. Here are the comparison stats for the current season:

    https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...&fid1=S&fid2=S

  2. #626
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,448
    Quote Originally Posted by Ludwig View Post

    On a separate matter, I compared the stats for Cam Zurhaar and Will Hayward. They are quite close statistically and if anything, Hayward would be ahead. Yet it's interesting that the perception of many on here would be that Zurhaar would be an upgrade on Hayward. I was one of those, but am now having a rethink. Here are the comparison stats for the current season:

    https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...&fid1=S&fid2=S
    But Hayward is getting those stats on a winning team where there ball is getting up forward more regularly than in North Melbourne's case, whereas Zurhaar is getting similar stats without the benefit of a midfield and defence like ours.

    There is also some attraction I guess to Zurhaar being a number 11 pick and should have more potential in him I guess?

  3. #627
    Veterans List Ludwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    9,324
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodspirit View Post
    I'm certain we'll turn over more than 3 players this off season and it wouldn't surprise me at all if it was double that much. As a minimum I expect to see four depart (say Naismith, Kennedy, Taylor and Sinclair) and I'd wager there'll be more than that.
    We've already used Naismith on HKK, so that would only leave 3 live picks. The 2 Irishmen are both in jeopardy of being cut. BOC would really have to put together a big final 2 months, and COR always seems to get injured when given a chance in the senior team. I would have Bell in my delistings, because I can't see how he gets a game in the future with several players in the VFL looking better prospects and having another draft year coming with fresh faces to choose from. But it would seem that the coaches value him more highly, so will probably keep his spot on the list. One thing that could hurt Bell is the recent success of Clarke, who is looking a better choice to be retained than Bell, based on AFL performances.

  4. #628
    Veterans List Ludwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    9,324
    Quote Originally Posted by Maltopia View Post
    But Hayward is getting those stats on a winning team where there ball is getting up forward more regularly than in North Melbourne's case, whereas Zurhaar is getting similar stats without the benefit of a midfield and defence like ours.

    There is also some attraction I guess to Zurhaar being a number 11 pick and should have more potential in him I guess?
    Zurhaar was a number 11 pick in the rookie draft.

    An argument can be made that Zurhaar has more opportunities to be targeting in a weak forward line. Surprisingly, Hayward has better stats in tackles and intercepts. I would have thought Zurhaar would be the better defensive player. Hayward's pressure acts are also better than Cam's.

    It's hard to justify trading for a player to replace a player who is arguably better. Zurhaar has some spectacular moments which improves the perception we have of him as a player.

    I think Liz suggested Tarrryn Thomas as someone to look at on North's list. He's had a terrible year and he's contracted until 2024. I would think North would want to keep him. But he looked a real star last year and someone who fits our game plan. I wonder if he's gettable.

  5. #629
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11,193
    I wouldn't take anyone from North. A Champion Data analysis of their list in the Herald Sun today only rate 5 players as above average. They have 16 players out of contract. There are a staggering number of players who have played none or few games. Maybe their recruiters who walked did the club a favour. Zurhaar is rated as average.

    They rated the following as above average: Jed Anderson 28, Jack Ziebell 31, Luke McDonald 27, Todd Goldstein 34, Aaron Hall 31. Cunnington 31 was an N/A. I think their list is in a lot of strife. The new coach will be endeavoring to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
    Last edited by Nico; 13th July 2022 at 07:54 PM.

  6. #630
    Quote Originally Posted by Nico View Post
    I wouldn't take anyone from North. A Champion Data analysis of their list in the Herald Sun today only rate 5 players as above average. They have 16 players out of contract. There are a staggering number of players who have played none or few games. Maybe their recruiters who walked did the club a favour. Zurhaar is rated as average.

    They rated the following as above average: Jed Anderson 28, Jack Ziebell 31, Luke McDonald 27, Todd Goldstein 34, Aaron Hall 31. Cunnington 31 was an N/A. I think their list is in a lot of strife. The new coach will be endeavoring to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
    LDU
    Tarryn Thomas
    Jy Simpkin
    Zurhaar
    Horne-Francis

  7. #631
    Reefer Madness
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    in a yellow submarine
    Posts
    4,587
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Markwebbos View Post
    LDU
    Tarryn Thomas
    Jy Simpkin
    Zurhaar
    Horne-Francis
    I’d take Larkey too. He kicked 40+ goals in the wooden spoon team last year.

    As for their ‘ratings’, they’re in a crap team playing dysfunctional football. Of course they look bad. Players don’t perform in isolation of what’s happening around them.
    'Delicious' is a fun word to say

  8. #632
    Quote Originally Posted by Markwebbos View Post
    LDU
    Tarryn Thomas
    Jy Simpkin
    Zurhaar
    Horne-Francis
    I agree. There is some young talent there. It reminds me of the final Fitzroy team in 1996. That team could only win one game in the Club's final season yet several of their team went on to have illustrious careers elsewhere and win premierships eg Chris Johnson, Martin Pike and Matthew Primus. At Fitzroy, they were in a poorly resourced and coached team but it all changed when they went to stronger teams. They were young and many of them developed after leaving. North would have at least six like this.

    https://www.lions.com.au/news/700396...e-an-injustice

  9. #633
    Ego alta, ergo ictus Ruck'n'Roll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Over here!
    Posts
    3,892
    We will almost certainly see the exit of several 30+ players, Sinkers for certain, the luckless Naismith likewise. Sadly JPK may also retire. I think Rampe's form is picking up, as has Sam Reids so I think we'll keep both.
    So probably 3 spots open up.

    Amongst the younger players Clarke may have saved his skin, but Taylor and O'Riordan's contracts end this year, and so too I suspect will their careers.
    Which gives us 1 more senior and 1 more Rookie spot to fill.
    Are we likely to bring in more than that? A cleanout would be a bit unusual for a team on a trajectory like ours.

    Of the other out of contract, I have no idea on Ben Ronke or James Bell, and O'Connor and Gould are yet to be tried.
    Last edited by Ruck'n'Roll; 14th July 2022 at 08:03 AM.
    Loose translation from the Latin is - I am tall, so I hit out.

  10. #634
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruck'n'Roll View Post
    We will almost certainly see the exit of several 30+ players, Sinkers for certain, the luckless Naismith likewise. Sadly JPK may also retire. I think Rampe's form is picking up, as has Sam Reids so I think we'll keep both.
    So probably 3 spots open up.

    Amongst the younger players Clarke may have saved his skin, but Taylor and O'Riordan's contracts end this year, and so too I suspect will their careers.
    Which gives us 1 more senior and 1 more Rookie spot to fill.
    Are we likely to bring in more than that? A cleanout would be a bit unusual for a team on a trajectory like ours.

    Of the other out of contract, I have no idea on Ben Ronke or James Bell, and O'Connor and Gould are yet to be tried.
    I think 8 to 10 players will depart the squad at season's end. The names you mention make sense to me. There will possibly be one or two rookies delisted as well. I think Gould will ask to go if he cannot break into the senior team before season's end. There is suddenly also a certain 35-year old key forward that might not be with us next season with recent developments!

    McLean may ask to be traded for more opportunities elsewhere although I think he still has one year left on his contract. I think one of Wicks or Ronke could go to. Bell is 50/50.

  11. #635
    Veteran Site Admin
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    16,514
    Quote Originally Posted by Aprilbr View Post
    There will possibly be one or two rookies delisted as well.
    Our rookies are:

    Fox - currently in senior team but living on year-by-year contracts (I believe)
    Taylor - close to certain to be cut
    BOC - who knows but doesn't seem close to breaking out
    Amartey, McLean, Wicks, Sheather - all with contracts for next season (and the first three having spent their allotted time on the rookie list, meaning they will need to be elevated)
    Hall-Kahan - only just arrived and on an 18 month contract

  12. #636
    Veterans List dejavoodoo44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    7,666
    Quote Originally Posted by liz View Post
    Our rookies are:

    Fox - currently in senior team but living on year-by-year contracts (I believe)
    Taylor - close to certain to be cut
    BOC - who knows but doesn't seem close to breaking out
    Amartey, McLean, Wicks, Sheather - all with contracts for next season (and the first three having spent their allotted time on the rookie list, meaning they will need to be elevated)
    Hall-Kahan - only just arrived and on an 18 month contract
    According to the AFL Record, Amartey is on the senior list. And McAndrew is also on the rookie list.

    One thing I was wondering about the rookie list. If, say, McLean decided that he would get more opportunities at another club, would we be able to trade him? Or does a player have to be on the senior list, in order for a club to trade them?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO