There are a few other articles about him and others on the site here
Swans chat Sydney Swans in the media - let us know if you see anything interesting
There are a few other articles about him and others on the site here
Swans chat Sydney Swans in the media - let us know if you see anything interesting
There may have been a perception, but there was little or no reality behind that perception. It was more a, "I'm not racist, but" excuse, to pretend that race and politics weren't behind it. I actually remember at the time, wondering why people were going on about Goodesy staging, as I was unaware of any staging that he was doing. So I did YouTube and Google searches, to see if I could find any evidence. Of course, they drew a blank. And in the course of the extended and interminable online debates at the time, when the staging was mentioned by people attempting to justify their campaign, I often asked them to provide evidence or point to any specific incident. Unsurprisingly, they were never able to do that.
So, yes, there was a perception, but that perception appeared to be almost entirely the result of widespread weasel words.
- - - Updated - - -
It's not persecution. It's justified negative feedback, that will hopefully modify his poor behaviour.
That would be the staging for the free that was given against Paddy. Some are saying that it was justified, but I view it as more of a classic Selwood slump. That is, after rising with the ball, he immediately lowered his body when Paddy went for the tackle, pushed the arms up, to move contact from around forearm to head, then accentuated the seemingly minimal contact. If I remember rightly, Paddy's arm was about his own hip level, and by the look on his face, he seemed to think that he had been conned.
Of course, it may have been an entirely legitimate free, but since the AFL has given a directive to the umpires, to be aware of that method of milking frees, largely because Ginnivan ( and others) was exploiting it so often earlier in the season, I and many others, are not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I love the fact that at almost 60 years of age I can still learn.
My latest learning is that I have been using the word perception wrong for so many years
The definition of perception is the ability to see, hear, or become aware of something through the senses.
That sounds like me to be evidence based rather than what my original belief in that it was influenced by the common consensus.
In fact what I probably should have referenced was an actual antonym of the word namely misconception.
So for the purposes of my previous posts please substitute misconception for perception.
My opinions however remain unchanged.
Yes. He’s a kid. It’s not acceptable.
One thing I’ve noticed, McRae has backed him and basically said it’s a good thing if he gets a free kick. It makes me wonder if their coaching panel have encouraged it somewhat (disclaimer: just surmising here) - which I’d like to think isn’t the case.
I have also noticed one of our young guns has removed this behaviour from his repertoire lately. Could just be me… but I haven’t seen it so much.
You’re correct. The underlying reasons for the booing are vastly different. But i don’t think that is the comparison being made here.
It’s more a generic observation on singling out players as villains & the potential for psychological impact.
I don’t like it & won’t do it - regardless of the reason.
I don't think making excuses for his staging, like saying that he's young, is going to stop him from staging. Nor will McRae backing him solve the problem. And I don't think people pretending that he isn't staging, or that pretending that opposition supporters are under some sort bizarre obligation not to express their displeasure, is going to solve the problem.
What I do think is an easy solution to the problem, is for people at Collingwood to tell him to modify his behaviour. If he can stop himself from throwing his head back when no contact has been made, or rapidly slumping to draw contact, then I feel sure that he will no longer get the reaction that he's currently getting. Perhaps the attention will then shift more to other flagrant stagers, like Weightman, but that's fine by me, because that might cause them to also change their approach.
I don't think it's ridiculous. Before the umpires were instructed to adapt the interpretation it would've been a free kick. He clearly raises his arm and lowers the body which has been instructed not to be paid, and it hasn't been, until this particular instance. Errol has changed his technique accordingly so I can't see why Ginnivan can't do the same.
Horse has commented, in a typical Horse manner.
Horse calls for respect after Ginnivan booing
I imagine the atmopshere that Goodes dealt with in the final year and a half of his career still feels pretty raw for Horse and others at the Swans. Regardless of the similarities or differences in the circumstances, he (Longmire) makes a pretty-easy-to-follow suggestion to fans.
Bookmarks