Originally Posted by
bomber.
So let me get this straight;
- 56 points is a lot - too much maybe but,
INCORRECT for the bottom teams
- Some clubs that need to use high points aren’t able to use that many, so high points is an ineffective tool for them
CORRECT - points is not a tool for making bottom teams better
- we’ve reduced the points for top teams, but they’re still the top teams, so we want to reduce their points further, to stop them developing.
Call Bullsxt- 1 point players = development. Anything above a 1 point player is called recruiting. Based on the last round St George at 22 points is developing not North Shore at 38 - that's called recruiting.
- we have a competition that could really be developed but want to stop development to contain the gap between the top and bottom
Ha Development or recruiting - self interest.
Do we have any idea what we’re doing?
Obviously you don't - self interest.
North Shore already has about 10 players in the WAFL, SANFL and VFL and had 5 or so missing from Prems on Saturday due to Swans duties. On top of that we have 5 or 6 state league level players who just don’t play, partly because they struggle with the level of the competition here. Our situation isn’t unique either.
Blah, Blah, Blah North Shore, North Shore, North Shore.
The competition standard is already diminished compared to what it could be.
Diminished compared to what - the Competition standard is at a high level
We could take that a bit further though and introduce a restricted player list for the top 25 players in the club, so they can’t play Sydney AFL. Same for UNSW, Sydney Uni etc.
?????????
That would even the comp up.
Then what would we do with the good players we took out of Sydney AFL.....??
Bookmarks