If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
We need MO back to beat Bris - not sure if Saddington actually has any good match-ups against them.
He certainly does against the other potential Grand Finalists.
Tarrant - Cornes - Hird
You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler
Saddo shouldn't play unless he's 100%, plus who would you drop??
It's a tough call but even if he's 95% it's a risk in such a big game.
"As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Has to be 100%, simply hasn't been good enough this year to justify being ahead of Stevens or Powell unless completely fit.
"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005
Originally posted by sharp9 Has to be 100%, simply hasn't been good enough this year to justify being ahead of Stevens or Powell unless completely fit.
Who would you pick out of those two?
I would like Powell as he goes a bit harder than Scotty IMO.
"My theory is that the universe is made out of stupidity because it's more plentiful than hydrogen" - Frank Zappa
Saddo hasnt been a favourite of mine since his return from injury. Before injury, he was playing great, with strong marks and spoils. Roosy selects him because we need his height. But he is too skinny to match up against a normal tall forward (who are usually quite bulky).
Using hypothesis testing via confidence intervals:
Nick Davis mark inside 50 = goal
Comment