Swans leaders to consider Hall punishment
Collapse
X
-
The difference in circumstances is huge.
Hall had a split second brain snap on the field.
Davis broke team/club rules by speaking to the media unendorsed, hung out at KFC for months on end or whatever the @@@@ he did, he didn't do it on the spur of the moment.
Whilst I agree with all here who believe the leadership group should not be involved in further punishing Hall, let's not delude ourselves into thinking the Hall case is the same as the Davis case.
Hall has been dealt with by the tribunal, he doesn't need double dose of punishment from teammates. Davis was not dealt with by the tribunal, his were off field indiscretions which the club found a need to deal with, somehow.Leave a comment:
-
-
Perhaps there is no loss of respect, but I would be surprised if someone like Kirk would still want Baz in the inner sanctum.They're saying that in the media, because that is the 'right' thing to say these days. Some of them would be annoyed at him, but I'd be surprised if any of them have actually lost any respect for him. He has a truckload of credits in the bank. Just remember, they're only footballers and none of them are perfect.Leave a comment:
-
They're saying that in the media, because that is the 'right' thing to say these days. Some of them would be annoyed at him, but I'd be surprised if any of them have actually lost any respect for him. He has a truckload of credits in the bank. Just remember, they're only footballers and none of them are perfect.
The self righteous crap they've gone on with this week has been painful to listen to.Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: