Teams v Richmond

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shaun..
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloody Hell
    They were coming at us, but it wasn't a close win....I think we won by 19 points?
    Mattner's tackle saved us from going behind and all their momentum. We were in trouble and probably would have lost the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaun..
    replied
    Originally posted by Jewels
    DST you should just cut and paste this every week to save yourself the effort of re-writing it every week!
    Some folks just don't get it
    They want to see Melbourne-style changes each week

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Originally posted by ShockOfHair
    But for Mattner's tackle, they might have beaten us at the SCG.
    They were coming at us, but it wasn't a close win....I think we won by 19 points?

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockOfHair
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloody Hell
    The only thing is the Swans away record stands at 0-7 this season...other than that all signs point to yes.
    But for Mattner's tackle, they might have beaten us at the SCG.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jewels
    replied
    Originally posted by DST
    Of those that are not injured or returning from injury, they have given game time to White, Barlow, Bird, Hannaberry, Thornton, Smith, Jack, Vespa and to a lesser extent Brabazon all in the last 8 weeks.

    All this while at least maintaining a core group to keep some sort of consistent team form.

    If they drop off Bird and maybe one of Ablett or Crouch for Vespa and MOD/Thornton then the match committee can maintain that they have kept to their word in playing what youngsters we have available at present. There is no need to play all the youngesters at once, especially if some are only getting a game for development.

    Facts are, if Schmidt, Laidlaw, Merideth, DOK, Johnston, Currie and Murphy were all injury free then you could reasonably epext these guys to be getting some game time as well but they are not.

    DST
    DST you should just cut and paste this every week to save yourself the effort of re-writing it every week!
    Some folks just don't get it

    Leave a comment:


  • DST
    replied
    Originally posted by ernie koala
    In your zeal for high ground you've missed my point. Which was an observation, that the in's list looks like lot of youngsters getting a game, but the reality is only one will, and that could easily be Bevo. Hopefully not.
    I'd like to see Ablett and Crouch making way for MOD and Thornton, and Vespa in
    for Bird.
    Of those that are not injured or returning from injury, they have given game time to White, Barlow, Bird, Hannaberry, Thornton, Smith, Jack, Vespa and to a lesser extent Brabazon all in the last 8 weeks.

    All this while at least maintaining a core group to keep some sort of consistent team form.

    If they drop off Bird and maybe one of Ablett or Crouch for Vespa and MOD/Thornton then the match committee can maintain that they have kept to their word in playing what youngsters we have available at present. There is no need to play all the youngesters at once, especially if some are only getting a game for development.

    Facts are, if Schmidt, Laidlaw, Merideth, DOK, Johnston, Currie and Murphy were all injury free then you could reasonably epext these guys to be getting some game time as well but they are not.

    DST

    Leave a comment:


  • top40
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloody Hell
    The only thing is the Swans away record stands at 0-7 this season...other than that all signs point to yes.
    Its actually 1-8 if you include the Canberra games

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Originally posted by Plugger46
    Was wondering the same thing earlier in the week
    The only thing is the Swans away record stands at 0-7 this season...other than that all signs point to yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • 10Totti10
    replied
    Cotchin out, no richo. Richmond r screwed. They struggled against Melbourne (worse than us), and we should have (wasn't for bad umpiring) beaten St Kilda. Plus its Micky O's 300th game so u expect a big one from him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Plugger46
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloody Hell
    Can't believe the Tiges are favorites for this game....am I missing something?
    Was wondering the same thing earlier in the week

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Can't believe the Tiges are favorites for this game....am I missing something?

    Leave a comment:


  • ernie koala
    replied
    Originally posted by DST
    We go through this every week

    Outside of the 25 named, who would you consider as young and not getting a game?

    DST
    In your zeal for high ground you've missed my point. Which was an observation, that the in's list looks like lot of youngsters getting a game, but the reality is only one will, and that could easily be Bevo. Hopefully not.
    I'd like to see Ablett and Crouch making way for MOD and Thornton, and Vespa in
    for Bird.
    Last edited by ernie koala; 6 August 2009, 07:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Originally posted by Rod_
    Pleased to see the team remain fairly stable..

    My selection for the bench

    Barlow, Bevan, Moore, O'Dwyer

    Rod_
    I think Bevan is going to have to displace either Smith or Crouch to get a game. Pyke for Bevan. See what happens with MOD.

    No Barry - was hoping they'd just stick him in for this game....just for the hell of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vonsteinman
    replied
    Originally posted by DST
    We go through this every week

    Outside of the 25 named, who would you consider as young and not getting a game?

    DST
    Agreed. Some punters won't be happy until Roosy names a couple of rising stars from the Manly Bombers Under 14s....

    Some say that teams "getting up" for milestone games is a load of crap, but if there were any truth to it, this group of blokes surely won't lose...

    Leave a comment:


  • DST
    replied
    Originally posted by ernie koala
    Hope I'm wrong but, it looks like lip service for the "play the young guys" mantra.
    We go through this every week

    Outside of the 25 named, who would you consider as young and not getting a game?

    DST

    Leave a comment:

Working...