Changes for Port Adelaide (Official teams named)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bleed Red Blood
    replied
    Originally posted by ugg
    Ted Richards and Pat Veszpremi. Two travelling emergencies would seem to suggest that Tadhg is in serious doubt.
    Richards? Don't need another tall..
    Bring on VES!

    Leave a comment:


  • swansrule100
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloody Hell
    You've misread the posts about Shaw and Malcheski. We were talking about our strongest 22 with no injuries to the list, not the current situation.
    i meant just in all the threads in general over the whole season

    Leave a comment:


  • ugg
    replied
    Originally posted by Nich
    Tadhg from what I've heard isn't a definite starter for the game and Roosy pretty much said he will be named but he still needs to improve before Saturday night.

    Does anyone know who is flying with the team as the Emergency?
    Ted Richards and Pat Veszpremi. Two travelling emergencies would seem to suggest that Tadhg is in serious doubt.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peace
    replied
    sorry, I meant our last 2 games have been a whole lot better than theirs!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nich
    replied
    Tadhg from what I've heard isn't a definite starter for the game and Roosy pretty much said he will be named but he still needs to improve before Saturday night.

    Does anyone know who is flying with the team as the Emergency?

    Leave a comment:


  • giant
    replied
    Originally posted by Peace
    i find it amazing that port are favourites for this game considering their current form and ours.
    Ours? We've one won of our last 5 games! Hardly sparkling. That said, I'm also a little surprised to see many people tipping Port - who knows which Port will turn up I guess?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peace
    replied
    i find it amazing that port are favourites for this game considering their current form and ours.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Originally posted by swansrule100
    some of the suggestions you see here from time to time baffle me. Eg shaw malceski these sorts of guys, they are no where near being dropped.

    Out of this weeks 22 id say as of right now the following just arent in line to be moved from the seniors (unless something dramatic happens form wise or injuries etc)

    Rhyce Shaw, Lewis Roberts-Thomson, Nick Smith
    Martin Mattner, Heath Grundy, Tadhg Kennelly
    Nick Malceski, Brett Kirk,
    Ryan O'Keefe, Adam Goodes, Josh Kennedy
    F: Daniel Hannebery, , Kieren Jack
    Foll: Shane Mumford, Jude Bolton, Jarrad McVeigh
    , Ben McGlynn,

    i would put bird in there but give him a few weeks from injury, rohan i left out because being first year is always a possibility to shift out for a rest and hanners might fall into that bracket but doubt it.
    You've misread the posts about Shaw and Malcheski. We were talking about our strongest 22 with no injuries to the list, not the current situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jewels
    replied
    Originally posted by swansrule100
    some of the suggestions you see here from time to time baffle me. Eg shaw malceski these sorts of guys, they are no where near being dropped.

    Out of this weeks 22 id say as of right now the following just arent in line to be moved from the seniors (unless something dramatic happens form wise or injuries etc)

    Rhyce Shaw, Lewis Roberts-Thomson, Nick Smith
    Martin Mattner, Heath Grundy, Tadhg Kennelly
    Nick Malceski, Brett Kirk,
    Ryan O'Keefe, Adam Goodes, Josh Kennedy
    F: Daniel Hannebery, , Kieren Jack
    Foll: Shane Mumford, Jude Bolton, Jarrad McVeigh
    , Ben McGlynn,

    i would put bird in there but give him a few weeks from injury, rohan i left out because being first year is always a possibility to shift out for a rest and hanners might fall into that bracket but doubt it.
    WE tend to forget that even though it's Hanners second year, he is a couple of years younger then Jetta and only four months older then Rohan.

    Leave a comment:


  • swansrule100
    replied
    some of the suggestions you see here from time to time baffle me. Eg shaw malceski these sorts of guys, they are no where near being dropped.

    Out of this weeks 22 id say as of right now the following just arent in line to be moved from the seniors (unless something dramatic happens form wise or injuries etc)

    Rhyce Shaw, Lewis Roberts-Thomson, Nick Smith
    Martin Mattner, Heath Grundy, Tadhg Kennelly
    Nick Malceski, Brett Kirk,
    Ryan O'Keefe, Adam Goodes, Josh Kennedy
    F: Daniel Hannebery, , Kieren Jack
    Foll: Shane Mumford, Jude Bolton, Jarrad McVeigh
    , Ben McGlynn,

    i would put bird in there but give him a few weeks from injury, rohan i left out because being first year is always a possibility to shift out for a rest and hanners might fall into that bracket but doubt it.

    Leave a comment:


  • liz
    replied
    Originally posted by giant
    Fair call. The link to that thread is a good reminder that Shaw's role this year has been different and that defensively he has been pretty effective. Especially when Kennelly is back and Mal is "on", any rebound Shaw provides is almost just a bonus.

    Leave a comment:


  • hammo
    replied
    Do we know who the travelling emergency/ies is yet?

    Vesz may get the call up as MOD didn't play reserves last week and they'd be keen to keep him playing, assuming we go for a runner as the travelling emergency.

    There must be a little doubt on Tadhg actually playing??

    Leave a comment:


  • giant
    replied
    Originally posted by liz
    I'd dispute that. With Smith not really playing on the very small forwards this year, and no Crouch, that job has largely fallen to Shaw and has gone unheralded. And I don't think we've been cut up so far this year by a small forward. Davey did kick a couple of goals on Sunday - and noticeably outmarked Shaw on one occasion - but I still don't think he cut Shaw up. So Shaw's defensive contributions have actually been quite important, and he is still providing rebound as well.
    Well, almost unheralded.

    Leave a comment:


  • ugg
    replied
    Originally posted by Hartijon
    Can any of the stats people confirm Roosey's statement? What is Playfair's average goal tally per game? It must be pretty good if Roos is worried that dropping him might drop off the scoring.
    RedAndWhiteOnline.com - Top Scorers

    Leave a comment:


  • Hartijon
    replied
    Originally posted by Nich
    'Roos said McGlynn's return and the emergence of Sydney's other first round draft pick Gary Rohan, as a handy goal kicker, meant Sydney could rest Playfair without worrying about a potential drop off in scoring.'

    Sweet. Please stop playing him down back and I'll be a happy camper : ) (Rohan that is)
    Can any of the stats people confirm Roosey's statement? What is Playfair's average goal tally per game? It must be pretty good if Roos is worried that dropping him might drop off the scoring.

    Leave a comment:

Working...