swans on FTA outside sydney

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • goswannie14
    replied
    Originally posted by KirkysSocks
    One and TEN
    They are the same network. Until the Govt changes the anti-siphoning laws it isn't going to be any different.
    Last edited by goswannie14; 12 June 2010, 08:08 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Damien
    replied
    Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
    So the Essendon game also gets streamed online instead of the Sydney one. Genius!
    Live on Sydney Channel 10, I am sure there is some site out there that can be googled for Sydney 10. Hopefully you can find one out there.

    Leave a comment:


  • DeadlyAkkuret
    replied
    So the Essendon game also gets streamed online instead of the Sydney one. Genius!

    Leave a comment:


  • ScottH
    replied
    Well, given that 2 Vic teams play tonight, and 2 non Vic teams play, Vic game will have more viewers than the non vic game.

    Whilst it annoys me, The TV rights >> than the old "bums on seats" theory.

    And Cher was right, Bombers were on Fox last week, not FTA.

    Leave a comment:


  • aardvark
    replied
    Oh , and btw, the cable coverage is great..NO ads during the play. And nothing is worse than having the flow of the game stopped completely at every goal by FTA ads. Nothing comes for nothing these days![/QUOTE]

    and you don't have to listen to Kelly bloody underwood....worth every cent i recon

    Leave a comment:


  • Cher
    replied
    Originally posted by KirkysSocks
    This is becoming a joke in Melbourne. Again for the 12th week in a row Essendong get their game on FTA.

    Thats every round this year essendon have been shown on FTA. Does dimwit own the companies that sponsor the bummers? Does he have shares in 3?
    I'd have to disagree with you. Essendon were not on FTA last weekend, they were playing us!

    Cher

    Leave a comment:


  • Matty10
    replied
    Originally posted by Damien
    They would still delay an interstate match 3-6 in Melbourne even if it was a 2pm start. The AFL have given them all Melbourne games for the 2.10pm slot but there is really no reason why they have to, they still delay Friday night matches from Brisbane or Adelaide into Melbourne.
    True. But that might cause more complaints from some (and it is also possible that the scheduled times are the way they are because the networks asked for them that way).

    I'd rather have live action than delayed (particularly the way Seven does it on Sundays, which is different from their Friday setup - sometimes they have about 12 ads between goals! If the game is in Melbourne, I can just go to the ground, otherwise I'd prefer to see it live, even if it was only on Foxtel (or I could have a lemonade at the pub). If Seven ran their Sunday (interstate) games live there would be no problem with your suggestion from my point of view.

    Leave a comment:


  • DeadlyAkkuret
    replied
    Same in WA, we get the Essendon game AGAIN. To make it worse there's no game on at all during the day because of the Queen's Birthday game

    Leave a comment:


  • Damien
    replied
    Originally posted by swans_premiers
    Swans have been on prob 2-3 times in Adelaide this year. Even when we play early sunday games like against Geelong n they don't have anything scheduled til 4pm when adel/port played they decided to not to show any games.
    We have a similiar problem in Sydney with some teams, if the Swans play at 1pm on a Sunday, C7 show the game at 1pm, and so do Foxtel, and we don't get the FTA game at all until it's replayed on Foxtel. Would be a much bigger problem in Perth and Adelaide for fans of non local teams though especially with two teams having their Foxtel games flipped over to FTA all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Damien
    replied
    Originally posted by Matty10
    I don't think that is necessarily correct. Seven has the Sunday games on FTA at the moment and they like to have their broadcast run into their news at 6pm, which is why they show delayed broadcasts of Melbourne games as their preference.
    They would still delay an interstate match 3-6 in Melbourne even if it was a 2pm start. The AFL have given them all Melbourne games for the 2.10pm slot but there is really no reason why they have to, they still delay Friday night matches from Brisbane or Adelaide into Melbourne.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matty10
    replied
    Originally posted by Damien
    More Sydney games at 2pm Sunday in Sydney will give Melbourne more FTA, that's what all Melbourne fans should be asking the Club to request more of. Sat day or night games means it is totally in the hands of Ten and Foxtel to decide.
    I don't think that is necessarily correct. Seven has the Sunday games on FTA at the moment and they like to have their broadcast run into their news at 6pm, which is why they show delayed broadcasts of Melbourne games as their preference.

    Leave a comment:


  • swans_premiers
    replied
    Swans have been on prob 2-3 times in Adelaide this year. Even when we play early sunday games like against Geelong n they don't have anything scheduled til 4pm when adel/port played they decided to not to show any games.

    Leave a comment:


  • Damien
    replied
    FTA/PAY split is announced same time as the draw in October. Not saying it is right or fair, but we have known the deal for over 12 months, plus Foxtel and AFL isn't going anywhere. Eventually we will have pay as you go internet coverage from FTA and PAY, but until then options are pretty clear and not about to change.

    More Sydney games at 2pm Sunday in Sydney will give Melbourne more FTA, that's what all Melbourne fans should be asking the Club to request more of. Sat day or night games means it is totally in the hands of Ten and Foxtel to decide.

    Leave a comment:


  • BSA5
    replied
    Originally posted by KirkysSocks
    oh noes how dare i not drink something that looks like urine and taste like it?
    If all you've ever drunk is VB, then I'd agree with you. Plenty of quality beers out there though.

    Anyway, on topic, the government needs to sort out the anti-siphoning laws. My understanding (which I freely admit is limited, so if somebody knows better, please correct me) is that anti-siphoning laws prevent "secondary" channels like One from broadcasting major live sports events unless the main channel is too. This is ridiculous, and greatly reduces the utility of channels like One, Seven2, Seven3, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • KirkysSocks
    replied
    Originally posted by Triple B
    Hard to disagree with your last comment.

    oh noes how dare i not drink something that looks like urine and taste like it?

    Leave a comment:

Working...