Changes for Rnd 5 v Hawks
Collapse
X
-
Don't be surprised if there is a late change due to injury, ducks and drakes maybe, although Horse isn't known for that type of tactic, Jesse will be flying down with the team, I'd like to see them both play as well -
Well Im torn as Im a fan of LRT and White here but given we are playing Hawks if LRT is required to go to Buddy who is the 2nd ruck option? I thought for team balance they would have left white in at FF and dropped Everrit. This probably does indicate they dont see or regard White as a key forward? After a couple of resonable games where he did his job as 2nd ruck why wouldnt they play him as FF? Everrit has had many chances and is at best a utility/parts man I would have thought developing Jesse into key fwd role would have been a option, but the coaches obviously know the balance they want and is best for the team. I have to admit Im struggling to understand the FWD structure they are trying to achieve I dont think we have the correct fwd structure as is, to get us far in sept but that is only IMHO which stands for crap.
Cheers
wazLeave a comment:
-
-
Of course White contributed to the win. Just because he didn't score three goals didn't mean he didn't help set up an equivalent number.No. What it means is that with Goodes coming back we didn't need White to play forward so we could pick a 2nd ruck who could play back if Buddy/Roughy get out of control. I'll say it again, White looked good at times last week BUT he didn't have a scoring shot and gave away 5 really dumb frees. Not good enough for a KP forward IMO and it seems the selectors agree.
The difference between White and Everitt last week was that Everitt played his role well and contributed significantly to the win. White didn't.
As for his 5 "really dumb frees", that is a bit harsh. One was a dreadful HTB decision against him that bore no resemblance to how that rule was interpreted for the rest of the game. There was another HTB against him on the wing that was a clear HTB but it happened because he was trying to set something up, rather than just bang the ball on his boot. I don't mind it when players get pinged for HTB in those circumstances because it wasn't lack of awareness. He was just waiting for support that didn't arrive in time. One was a fairly soft ITB against him in a pack marking situation. I can't recall the other two but those three I have identified were hardly "dumb".
I'd have liked to see him get another go this week, but I have no issues with LRT coming in either. Jesse is currently on the fringes of the senior team because he hasn't grabbed all the chances that have come his way over the past couple of seasons. He is going to have to wait his turn and hope that when / if he does get another chance, he continues to make a decent contribution to the team.Leave a comment:
-
-
No. What it means is that with Goodes coming back we didn't need White to play forward so we could pick a 2nd ruck who could play back if Buddy/Roughy get out of control. I'll say it again, White looked good at times last week BUT he didn't have a scoring shot and gave away 5 really dumb frees. Not good enough for a KP forward IMO and it seems the selectors agree.
The difference between White and Everitt last week was that Everitt played his role well and contributed significantly to the win. White didn't.Leave a comment:
-
Credits in the bank are crap. Brad Green had plenty of credits in the bank at Melbourne and look at him. Always pick on current form not past deeds. Having said that both these blokes have pretty good form. LRT had good games before injury and Jesse's form the last two weeks has been good.
I just want to be clear on one thing that I truly believe. Some are saying LRT will play on Buddy, if so he will get towelled up like he always does on Buddy. He is not the right match up on Buddy, as a matter of fact I believe you have to double team him, one while in the forward line and one when he moves down the ground. The other thing to do is to concede there is nobody who can match up on Buddy and play Reg on him. Concentrate on their mids and Rioli and Osborne. Roughy and Hale will rest forward and will kick goals if they get it.Leave a comment:
-
I agree with you that White is stiff. I too want him in the team and would much rather him then Everitt, regardless of how well Everitt played last week. Annoys me that Horse doesn't seem to want to play White and LRT together.I suspect that you're correct that Lewis has got some credits in the bank and it helps him nudge ahead for selection.
Happy to agree to disagree on their contribution so far, granted "possibly slightly better" isn't exactly demanding Jesse is way in front. I do think that in the two games there's been a fair difference in their ruckwork (to my eyes), with Jesse in front; that may not have shown up in stats but I do think Jesse has been limiting his opponent's ruck effectiveness a little more whilst directing his own won taps a bit better (he hasn't matched up against Sandilands, but I don't recall Lewis going head to head with him too often in that game).
I'm actually happy with either of them in the role, really, and do hope Lewis has a blinder- just thought Jesse was a bit stiff to miss.Leave a comment:
-
I'd say he was brought in to play on Hale actually. Hale has been very effective in the forward line for the Hawks. But if that were the case Jesse should still be playing. But they may just get LRT to follow Hale no matter where he goes. The other alternative is Seaby on Hale in the ruck and LRT while he is forward and Drey or Goodsie taking Roughy in the ruck.Leave a comment:
-
Anyone who was taken from the field coughing up copious quantities of blood and nearly dies for the Swans is always going to be defended by me...Leave a comment:
-
I suspect that you're correct that Lewis has got some credits in the bank and it helps him nudge ahead for selection.
Happy to agree to disagree on their contribution so far, granted "possibly slightly better" isn't exactly demanding Jesse is way in front. I do think that in the two games there's been a fair difference in their ruckwork (to my eyes), with Jesse in front; that may not have shown up in stats but I do think Jesse has been limiting his opponent's ruck effectiveness a little more whilst directing his own won taps a bit better (he hasn't matched up against Sandilands, but I don't recall Lewis going head to head with him too often in that game).
I'm actually happy with either of them in the role, really, and do hope Lewis has a blinder- just thought Jesse was a bit stiff to miss.Leave a comment:
-
Surely a combo of both. In this case, if a players form is similar to anothers, then prior experience/long term form must be factored in.Leave a comment:
-
-
I'm very glad that I defended Ted as hard as possible. Have always loved him.Hey, I was part of that crowd...and we were right. He was rubbish....gave up 3 goals a week from stupid decisions, schoolboy turnovers or unnecessary frees.
I must know nothing about football 'cos he suddenly grew a brain as well as a heart. Barely puts a foot wrong and right now is in AA contention for CHB
Everyone goes through a bad patch at some stage.Leave a comment:
-
Two different points of view: Do the Swans play themselves into or out of the firsts as the Doctor says, or are there such things as selection credits?Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: