Changes for Rnd 7 V Tigers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • swanspant12
    replied
    No Reid, Mumford or Goodes

    Bring in White, Pyke in the goal square he will be too tall for the tigers. Cant believe our best 3 players are out and our 2 mobile forwards in goodesy and reid. Cant see us winning this unless we bring in white and pyke.

    Leave a comment:


  • GongSwan
    replied
    We just need to replace him with a forward, and take dre off teh sub and put in a hard running player, I wonder if we'll get draft concessions when Goodes retires, (2020) that would seem fair

    Leave a comment:


  • Dosser
    replied
    Originally posted by ShockOfHair
    LRT says "any number" of players could replace Goodes.

    So far we've nominated eight - Armstrong, Cunningham, Gordon, Morton, Pyke, TDL, Walsh and/or White. Anyone else?
    Are we allowed to replace him with eight?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hartijon
    replied
    Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
    Hmmm, if this is the case then I wouldn't mind seeing AJ and LRT swapping, AJ to have a run up forward and LRT down back. Can't lose much with LRT not being up forward, could probably gain a little height, strength and experience down back. ( will lose some run though). Couldn't hurt to see how AJ goes up forward. Could prove a master stroke. I think if the game last week showed anything it's that against the top teams we need to take advantage of our forward entries, which if we had of done against the crows ( we had a good deal more inside 50's) we would have won comfortably. The only way to do this is to have a settled, functioning forward set up. We still have not got this and need to find it or we can forget top 4.
    Amen Brother and some of us have been saying this for 2 years.Check the old thread "Forward Structure" for some really fine contributions on this very point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Melbourne_Blood
    replied
    Hmmm, if this is the case then I wouldn't mind seeing AJ and LRT swapping, AJ to have a run up forward and LRT down back. Can't lose much with LRT not being up forward, could probably gain a little height, strength and experience down back. ( will lose some run though). Couldn't hurt to see how AJ goes up forward. Could prove a master stroke. I think if the game last week showed anything it's that against the top teams we need to take advantage of our forward entries, which if we had of done against the crows ( we had a good deal more inside 50's) we would have won comfortably. The only way to do this is to have a settled, functioning forward set up. We still have not got this and need to find it or we can forget top 4.

    Leave a comment:

Working...