Changes for Rnd 16 V The Eagles

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Doctor
    replied
    Well I'd have preferred TDL to be in the side, but we're on top, so I assume the coaching staff know what they're doing!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt79
    replied
    Originally posted by ugg
    Final teams

    Eagles
    I/C: Mitch Brown, Koby Stevens, Jacob Brennan, Thomas Swift
    Emg: Lewis Stevenson, Murray Newman, Fraser McInnes


    In: Adam Selwood, Mitch Brown, Brad Sheppard, Thomas Swift
    Out: Quinten Lynch (Suspension), Luke Shuey (Suspension), Josh Hill (Hamstring), Murray Newman


    Swans
    I/C: Martin Mattner, Daniel Hannebery, Mike Pyke, Andrejs Everitt
    Emg: Trent Dennis-Lane, Tony Armstrong, Tommy Walsh


    In: Martin Mattner
    Out: Tony Armstrong
    I would have loved to have seen TDL get a run back in his home town. My preference would have been Everitt out too with TDL in.

    As it is, you can bank on Everitt being the sub.

    Leave a comment:


  • ugg
    replied
    Final teams

    Eagles
    I/C: Mitch Brown, Koby Stevens, Jacob Brennan, Thomas Swift
    Emg: Lewis Stevenson, Murray Newman, Fraser McInnes


    In: Adam Selwood, Mitch Brown, Brad Sheppard, Thomas Swift
    Out: Quinten Lynch (Suspension), Luke Shuey (Suspension), Josh Hill (Hamstring), Murray Newman


    Swans
    I/C: Martin Mattner, Daniel Hannebery, Mike Pyke, Andrejs Everitt
    Emg: Trent Dennis-Lane, Tony Armstrong, Tommy Walsh


    In: Martin Mattner
    Out: Tony Armstrong

    Leave a comment:


  • GongSwan
    replied
    Originally posted by Go Swannies
    Perth forecast -

    Sunday A shower or two. Min 6 Max 19
    Beautiful for us, tad cool for them I would have thought

    Leave a comment:


  • Go Swannies
    replied
    Perth forecast -

    Sunday A shower or two. Min 6 Max 19

    Leave a comment:


  • giant
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
    I suspect so too.
    If they play Pike, Sam and Goodes up forward then there's no need for LRT, but the temptation to utilise him down back (if Ted/Reg can't handle the resting ruckman) or up forward (if Goodes moves onto the ball) will see him keep his place.
    Will this make us top heavy?
    THis is what I think will be occupying the minds of the match committee most - to LRT, or not to LRT. Would be a very handy back up defender if the resting rucks become a handful for Grundy/Ted, but may be exposed at Subi as one tall too many if played as a forward. Not easy.

    Leave a comment:


  • ugg
    replied
    I don't think we will put LRT back on Cox, not from the start anyway. Whoever is on Cox or NicNat while they are playing as forward will require help and we may try and engineer a loose man, or the "plus one" as Rodney Eade likes to call it, in Mattner or Johnson to assist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nico
    replied
    Originally posted by swanspant12
    Don't think LRT has the height to go with cox. Pyke will run with him you'd think.
    Maybe they will tag team him. On the ball Pyke gets him, up forward LRT takes over.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Magoo
    replied
    If the order of the interchange sent out by the swans in the match preview is any indicator then it may be Everitt, Armstrong and Walsh will be the emergencies.

    Would make sense - armstrong for mattner, tdl for everitt.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dirtyburt
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
    I suspect so too.
    If they play Pike, Sam and Goodes up forward then there's no need for LRT, but the temptation to utilise him down back (if Ted/Reg can't handle the resting ruckman) or up forward (if Goodes moves onto the ball) will see him keep his place.
    Will this make us top heavy?
    I think they will not allow cox to drop back into the whole. I suspect that LRT will assigned the task of manning him when he is not in the square. Similar role he played on Gardiner in 2005

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruck'n'Roll
    replied
    Originally posted by BillyRayCypress
    My money is that there will be no change to last weeks team.
    I suspect so too.
    If they play Pike, Sam and Goodes up forward then there's no need for LRT, but the temptation to utilise him down back (if Ted/Reg can't handle the resting ruckman) or up forward (if Goodes moves onto the ball) will see him keep his place.
    Will this make us top heavy?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Originally posted by Dirtyburt
    LRT may be used in exactly that role to tag cox around the ground.
    We can only hope.

    Leave a comment:


  • BillyRayCypress
    replied
    My money is that there will be no change to last weeks team.

    Makes no sense to have Mattner on the bench and then the person who replaced him last week in the side. Unless Mattner is a no go.

    If anyone came in I would hope that its TDL.

    Leave a comment:


  • Go Swannies
    replied
    Originally posted by swanspant12
    Don't think LRT has the height to go with cox. Pyke will run with him you'd think.
    Pyke may have the speed but I don't think he has the smarts. I'm guessing LRT at least in our forward half and Reg in the back half.

    Leave a comment:


  • swanspant12
    replied
    Originally posted by Dirtyburt
    LRT may be used in exactly that role to tag cox around the ground.
    Don't think LRT has the height to go with cox. Pyke will run with him you'd think.

    Leave a comment:

Working...