"Slingshot" Swans

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • erica
    Happy and I know it
    • Jan 2008
    • 1247
    #1

    "Slingshot" Swans

    Apparently we now play a new form of footy called "slingshot footy".

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/spo...-1226479776681
    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    Tags: slingshot, Swans
    • TakeTheSaucepan
      On the Rookie List
      • Nov 2009
      • 23
      #2
      That's a report from the Melbourne 'Herald Sun'. The term slingshot has been used for pretty much most of the year. I know from watching 'On the Couch' on Fox that Gerard Healy and Paul Roos have been using it since round 3.

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665
          #3
          Ah, if only Rooster was there, it would be a double barrel!!

            Comment

            • Industrial Fan
              Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
              • Aug 2006
              • 3334
              #4
              Originally posted by ScottH
              Ah, if only Rooster was there, it would be a double barrel!!
              This weekend I was watching the swans v west coast game from last year when Rohan came on as a sub. Attacked the ball like a maniac for 30 mins and ended up with around 11 possessions.

              What a shame he wont be there on the weekend
              He ate more cheese, than time allowed

                Comment

                • DLBIA14
                  On the Rookie List
                  • May 2010
                  • 673
                  #5
                  God I've missed Gary this year. We would be a much better team with him. His marking ability, his height, speed, versatility... We're in a grannie, but I can't help but think about the sort of team we'd be with him. Must be hard for him sitting on the sidelines. Poor thing.

                    Comment

                    • Rod_
                      Senior Player
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 1180
                      #6
                      Agreed a little Red Rooster would have been very handy indeed!

                        Comment

                        • dimelb
                          pr. dim-melb; m not f
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 6889
                          #7
                          Originally posted by ScottH
                          Ah, if only Rooster was there, it would be a double barrel!!
                          Absolutely. Would blow them away.
                          He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                            Comment

                            • Jewels
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 3258
                              #8
                              Originally posted by dimelb
                              Absolutely. Would blow them away.
                              If nothing else we'd have a far more damaging forward line!

                                Comment

                                Previous template Next
                                Working...