Changes for Round 4 versus Kangaroos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ernie koala
    replied
    It seems ROK, without doing much that I've noticed, has quietly re-cemented his place in the team.

    I do get the feeling his form is improving with each outing.

    A wet game, against a one paced Kangas, might well be to his liking.

    Leave a comment:


  • Melbourne_Blood
    replied
    Wet weather ? Oh @@@@ .....

    Leave a comment:


  • Ludwig
    replied
    A ruckman is almost always named as an emergency. Nanko was named last week as well.

    It's just in case Pyke and Derickx find themselves in a car driven by Hanners.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt80
    replied
    Originally posted by ShockOfHair
    Nanko's an interesting inclusion. Unless there's an injury concern we don't know about it must mean a lack of confidence over Derrickx.
    I think it must be a injury concern to either Tom D or Pyke.

    I would think that they would have had confidence in Tom D after his solid work against Adelaide.

    Look out for Pyke or Tom D to be a late withdrawal through injury.

    It's seems illogical to have three ruckman in a 25 man squad, in what is looking like a wet weather game.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockOfHair
    replied
    Nanko's an interesting inclusion. Unless there's an injury concern we don't know about it must mean a lack of confidence over Derrickx.

    Leave a comment:

Working...