2015 academy discussion thread (with some FS thrown in for good measure)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 707
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2009
    • 6204

    #796
    Clever solution Barry, wonder why the VFL didn't think of that?

    Why not get in touch will Gillon and tell him you can make his trading future picks angst go away. Better ring Eddie before that, just to make sure it gets his approval first!

    Comment

    • Dosser
      Just wild about Harry
      • Mar 2011
      • 1833

      #797
      Originally posted by Mug Punter
      Where would they be relocated - maybe Tasmania I guess but I'm still not sure it has the corporate support and infrastructure?

      I can se both GWS and Gold COast struggling long term - GWS will have on field success with that list for sure but their off-field challenges are enormous.

      Reckon you'd get a LOT of oppositin from the Melbourne clubs if WA/SA each get to split their top kids between two clubs with the Melbourne clubs excluded. Bottom line is that I really can't see how the comp can sustain 10 Victorian sides from the Victorian recruitment base so on that masure I reckon a return to the zone system would get a lot of opposition from the
      If the zone system comes back then we should all start supporting Geelong.

      Comment

      • sharp9
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2003
        • 2508

        #798
        I think that the current points system is hideously unfair to us....until you get into the real world and ask a club would they trade picks 18, 36, 54 and 72 for pick 1....pretty sure they'd all say yes. Damn.
        Personally I think that the maximum payment should be two picks with 50% of the round discount - i.e. if you have 18 then bids 10-17 you pay #18. - bids 1-9 you pay 18 and 36.
        "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

        Comment

        • Mug Punter
          On the Rookie List
          • Nov 2009
          • 3325

          #799
          Originally posted by sharp9
          I think that the current points system is hideously unfair to us....until you get into the real world and ask a club would they trade picks 18, 36, 54 and 72 for pick 1....pretty sure they'd all say yes. Damn.
          Spot on.

          And it is only really onerous when you are a top 4 team.

          If we finished eighth this year then we'd only give up a first and second round pick and a bit of loose change.

          The capping of the discount at pick 18 is also a significant concession to allow us to draft second rounders onwards with smaller relative penalty.

          Also, I know I shouldn't be wishing ill on Brisbane and Gold Coast but just this year it would really be helpful if they could finish last and second last. As we all know Mills slipping from pick 1 to 3 will make it so much easier to draft Mills and Dunkley

          Comment

          • troyjones2525
            Swans Fanatic!
            • Mar 2008
            • 2908

            #800
            Interesting that Dunkley has been back playing for a few weeks now and hasn't found his way into the goal kickers or best list for the gippsland power at all.

            Comment

            • Conor_Dillon
              On the Rookie List
              • Jun 2013
              • 1224

              #801
              Originally posted by troyjones2525
              Interesting that Dunkley has been back playing for a few weeks now and hasn't found his way into the goal kickers or best list for the gippsland power at all.
              Not a bad thing at all!
              Twitter @cmdil
              Instagram @conordillon

              Comment

              • jono2707
                Goes up to 11
                • Oct 2007
                • 3326

                #802
                Originally posted by Conor_Dillon
                Not a bad thing at all!
                Unless that means that he's not as good as some of his peers as compared to when he was younger....

                Comment

                • Conor_Dillon
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 1224

                  #803
                  Without being able to find the actual post, I mentioned last season that a lot of his junior dominance could be because he was the size he is now at 15 years old (when he won a senior premiership for Sale) and therefore always one of the biggest kids on the field. Having said that, I still think he'll be a decent AFL player if given the chance, just maybe not worthy of a first round pick.
                  Twitter @cmdil
                  Instagram @conordillon

                  Comment

                  • 707
                    Veterans List
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 6204

                    #804
                    Interestingly some of the dedicated U18 watchers don't rate Dunkley's skills that highly. I get the feeling that as a number of other kids make their mark that Dunkley may slip down the order. Hopper BOG in his championship game is good news.

                    Liking how the bottom four is shaping too, two academy sides at the bottom, great that Melbourne appear to be going up the table, great win by them yesterday and should have won last week too. Stating the obvious but Mills slipping out is very important to us.

                    Comment

                    • kangle4
                      Warming the Bench
                      • May 2003
                      • 200

                      #805
                      The TAC Cup footy show spoke about Dunkley last Sunday. Said he had played a couple of games for Gippsland and they expected him to be back for VIC Country in the next round of games. Had him ranked 15th overall, Mills 5th.

                      Still hasn't nominated for father/son yet either, they think he'll wait until after the carnival is finished to make a decision.

                      Comment

                      • Mug Punter
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 3325

                        #806
                        Originally posted by kangle4
                        The TAC Cup footy show spoke about Dunkley last Sunday. Said he had played a couple of games for Gippsland and they expected him to be back for VIC Country in the next round of games. Had him ranked 15th overall, Mills 5th.

                        Still hasn't nominated for father/son yet either, they think he'll wait until after the carnival is finished to make a decision.
                        I think we'd all be happy with that scenario in temns of picks, and I'd be surprised if he didn't niminate for F/S

                        Comment

                        • CureTheSane
                          Carpe Noctem
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 5032

                          #807
                          Originally posted by 707
                          Interestingly some of the dedicated U18 watchers don't rate Dunkley's skills that highly.
                          He's a Dunkley
                          Some skills are bound to be lacking
                          The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                          Comment

                          • Nico
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 11536

                            #808
                            Originally posted by troyjones2525
                            Interesting that Dunkley has been back playing for a few weeks now and hasn't found his way into the goal kickers or best list for the gippsland power at all.
                            Did he not play a game for Richmond 2's?
                            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                            Comment

                            • liz
                              Veteran
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 16865

                              #809
                              Hawthorn has sensationally declared it will walk away from the AFL's chief equalisation measure if the northern-based clubs are allowed to exclusively access future draft picks this season.


                              So, the Hawks are having a dummy spit and threatening to "refuse" to comply with the AFL's equalisation measures (revenue sharing). I wasn't under the impression clubs could pick and choose.

                              How about the Swans (and other Northern clubs) have a dummy spit of their own and refuse to comply with the changes to the access they were promised to Academy players seven years ago as an inducement to invest in those academies, which has led to them each investing millions of dollars and goodness knows how many hours? After all, every single club knew about the academy system back when they were set up, and presumably their silence over the six or so years before Ed'n'Andy got wind of Isaac Heeney, indicates they were in agreement with this inducement.

                              Comment

                              • Ampersand
                                On the Rookie List
                                • Apr 2014
                                • 694

                                #810
                                I honestly think that if Newbold gets his way it's time to seriously consider abandoning the Academy system once and for all. The changes so far proposed, which decimate our draft picks, make it borderline untenable already. It makes no commercial sense for the Swans to invest revenue and administration into a program from which they devise absolutely no benefit.

                                Will the AFL be willing and able to take over, pay for and administer a development program for the northern states with a view to increasing the amount of general talent in the draft? I somehow don't think so.

                                Comment

                                Working...