Changes for Rnd 5 V West Coast

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • royboy42
    replied
    Originally posted by barry
    Mchack is slow. In a team that's slow. In a backline that is slower. We cannot afford to play mitchell and mchack in the same team. 1 slow small man you can live with .two and you can ?iss a flag goodbye.
    Mitchell is more value to the team than mchack.
    McHack...still? Between ANZ and out of date nicknames, you're losing touch with 2016 Barry

    Leave a comment:


  • liz
    replied
    I wouldn't have thought McVeigh is slow. I'd have thought him "average" pace for his size.

    If we can only carry one slow player in the team, we have some tough choices to make - we can only choose one of Hanners, JPK, Parker and Mitchell (if we take McVeigh as the benchmark for "slow").

    Leave a comment:


  • Swansongster
    replied
    Dear Baz. Clearly not watching if you think Mitchell and McVeigh aren't in our best 22 when fit.

    Leave a comment:


  • barry
    replied
    Mchack is slow. In a team that's slow. In a backline that is slower. We cannot afford to play mitchell and mchack in the same team. 1 slow small man you can live with .two and you can ?iss a flag goodbye.
    Mitchell is more value to the team than mchack.

    Leave a comment:


  • WauchopeAnalyst
    replied
    If Macca played forward and helps a bit in mids I would pick him every week. He needs just about a KPD to quiet him down. He will kill the flankers/pockets and get 2 goals and several assists most games.

    Leave a comment:

Working...