An appeal for Eddie

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KSAS
    replied
    Originally posted by KTigers
    You hit the nail on the head here Bloods05. "A highly political figure"? Really! I read the Cherny piece and almost fell over when I read that one. Cherny should go watch the new Spike Lee movie if he really wants to witness an overt political statement. Adam spoke and continues to speak about issues in a way that is comfortable to him. Just like Spike Lee does. It's not up to anybody else to determine what is the "acceptable" way for others to express their politics.
    The booing of Goodsey and the completely gutless reaction of the AFL to it in 2015 is such a scar on the game.
    +1 That what got me. So many editorials & people at the time had a go at Adam for making a "Invasion Day" reference during his Australian of the Year acceptance speech, when it was obvious they hadn't heard his entire speech. It was taken completely out of context & if they had bothered to hear his speech they would've seen how passive it was. But no, he was instantly labelled as some sort of political activist which still carries on to this day judging by this article.
    Last edited by KSAS; 19 June 2018, 05:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • AnnieH
    replied
    The article was written from a position of white privilege.
    Unless you have personally been racially vilified, you have personally been told to "go back to where you come from", have personally been told that because you are brown you are not good enough, you are talking directly from your arse.

    Leave a comment:


  • KTigers
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloods05
    Calling Goodes "a highly political figure" is a sly attempt to justify his treatment. If he was highly political, it was merely because he tried, in a variety of ways, to issue a direct challenge to Australians to face up to the reality of racism. Those who didn't, and don't, want to do that, who want to remain secure in their comfortable delusions about the state of race relations in Australia, reacted with fury to being challenged in this way. It is simply beyond dispute that his treatment was racist. Cherny has wimped out here.
    You hit the nail on the head here Bloods05. "A highly political figure"? Really! I read the Cherny piece and almost fell over when I read that one. Cherny should go watch the new Spike Lee movie if he really wants to witness an overt political statement. Adam spoke and continues to speak about issues in a way that is comfortable to him. Just like Spike Lee does. It's not up to anybody else to determine what is the "acceptable" way for others to express their politics.
    The booing of Goodsey and the completely gutless reaction of the AFL to it in 2015 is such a scar on the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • Blood Fever
    replied
    Originally posted by KSAS
    This article is crap. Journo is making a distinction that Betts is a more innocent/loveable figure than Goodes and because of that is more incensed about Betts being racially abused, because he sees Goodes being politically motivated and more or less brought the abuse upon himself! Racism has NO EXCEPTIONS!

    We've generally never liked our indigenous people to be up front and confrontational in their protests. Too uncomfortable. Gooodesy suffered huge backlash. Very intimidating for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • bloodspirit
    replied
    Nothing has no exceptions.

    Personally I find that absolutism and dogma suffer from the same problem as racism, namely being too close minded.

    Leave a comment:


  • KSAS
    replied
    This article is crap. Journo is making a distinction that Betts is a more innocent/loveable figure than Goodes and because of that is more incensed about Betts being racially abused, because he sees Goodes being politically motivated and more or less brought the abuse upon himself! Racism has NO EXCEPTIONS!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloods05
    replied
    Calling Goodes "a highly political figure" is a sly attempt to justify his treatment. If he was highly political, it was merely because he tried, in a variety of ways, to issue a direct challenge to Australians to face up to the reality of racism. Those who didn't, and don't, want to do that, who want to remain secure in their comfortable delusions about the state of race relations in Australia, reacted with fury to being challenged in this way. It is simply beyond dispute that his treatment was racist. Cherny has wimped out here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hotpotato
    replied
    Another 100 years of education and it might be eradicated , but I doubt it.
    Adam is going about his business . Addressed a conference with Micky O my sister attended recently.

    Leave a comment:


  • dimelb
    started a topic General footy chat An appeal for Eddie

    An appeal for Eddie

    I agreed with Daniel Cherny's main message, but am disappointed about his shifty fence-sitting on Goodesy, especially on the girl who was removed from the MCG (which Adam followed up in an empathic way), and allowing the booers excuse (BS if ever I smelt it).

    It’s hard to measure love, but there is an argument Eddie Betts is the most universally-loved AFL player of the decade. Certainly he is in the conversation.
Working...