Preliminary Finals: the little season that could.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nico
    replied
    I think Richmond will be too hard at the contest for Geelong.

    Leave a comment:


  • barry
    replied
    Originally posted by Sandrevan
    The prelims didn't play out as I hoped. I was hoping for a Lions vs Port gf. But not to be.

    I want Geelong to win - mostly for Gary Rohan. Like others, I have a soft spot for him and would love him to have a gf medal.
    Same. If Richmond are up by a bit at half time, I'm watching a movie on netflix.

    Leave a comment:


  • RogueSwan
    replied
    Originally posted by Sandrevan
    .... I can never like Richmond but I suspect they will win and with a bit of help from the umpires.
    What are you talking about? All their handballs are legal and Grimes is constantly getting pushed, he never learnt to dive from Rance

    Leave a comment:


  • Sandrevan
    replied
    The prelims didn't play out as I hoped. I was hoping for a Lions vs Port gf. But not to be.

    I want Geelong to win - mostly for Gary Rohan. Like others, I have a soft spot for him and would love him to have a gf medal. I can never like Richmond but I suspect they will win and with a bit of help from the umpires.

    Leave a comment:


  • KTigers
    replied
    Originally posted by Nico
    What Red are you on today Baz?
    Like a lot of people, all of them. It's been a difficult year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nico
    replied
    Originally posted by barry
    He is playing at his maximum capability right now for Geelong, and thats about the same as what he averaged at us. We didnt waste his talent, because he is not a super star.

    - - - Updated - - -



    If spellng is a cirteria for fandom, then I am in all sotrs of truoble.
    What Red are you on today Baz?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloods05
    replied
    Originally posted by Markwebbos
    Or even criterion
    Um, that was the joke.

    Leave a comment:


  • Blood Fever
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloods05
    It's cirterion, if you want to be properly wrong.
    LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • Markwebbos
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloods05
    It's cirterion, if you want to be properly wrong.
    Or even criterion

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloods05
    replied
    Originally posted by barry
    He is playing at his maximum capability right now for Geelong, and thats about the same as what he averaged at us. We didnt waste his talent, because he is not a super star.

    - - - Updated - - -



    If spellng is a cirteria for fandom, then I am in all sotrs of truoble.
    It's cirterion, if you want to be properly wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • barry
    replied
    Originally posted by stevoswan
    Not using him properly actually did hurt us....we wasted his talent. That hurts. Happy for him that he's found his niche at Geelong.....but I'm not happy for us.
    He is playing at his maximum capability right now for Geelong, and thats about the same as what he averaged at us. We didnt waste his talent, because he is not a super star.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Originally posted by KTigers
    On this not-a-real-fan thing....
    I am noticing a lot of people on RWO making spelling mistakes with players and officials names. It was highlighted
    last week in the posts relating to the appointment of Don Pyke to the Swans coaching ranks and the struggles many
    had with Don's four letter surname. Surely it's time to start calling into question a RWO posters "real fan" status
    when they make repeated spelling mistakes with players and officials names. I don't think claiming to be illiterate
    should be considered a valid excuse either.
    If spellng is a cirteria for fandom, then I am in all sotrs of truoble.

    Leave a comment:


  • Markwebbos
    replied
    I like to think everyone on here is a Swans fan.

    Questioning whether someone is a “real” fan or not smacks of attempting to impose one’s own values arbitrarily on someone else.

    Although I admit the spelling of Swans players’ (and future coache’s) names could be better.

    Leave a comment:


  • KTigers
    replied
    Originally posted by RogueSwan
    Not being petulant, just not interested. Guess I'm not the real footy fan I never claimed to be
    On this not-a-real-fan thing....
    I am noticing a lot of people on RWO making spelling mistakes with players and officials names. It was highlighted
    last week in the posts relating to the appointment of Don Pyke to the Swans coaching ranks and the struggles many
    had with Don's four letter surname. Surely it's time to start calling into question a RWO posters "real fan" status
    when they make repeated spelling mistakes with players and officials names. I don't think claiming to be illiterate
    should be considered a valid excuse either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Magoo
    replied
    Originally posted by stevoswan
    Not using him properly actually did hurt us....we wasted his talent. That hurts. Happy for him that he's found his niche at Geelong.....but I'm not happy for us.
    What do you think we did to waste his talents? I actually think the Swans gave him plenty of chances and he is essentially playing the same role for them as he did us. Rohan is just the type of player that doesnt get into the game that much and hence for me why he seems to fail in finals as the additional pressure and lack of predicability works against his natural game.

    I would be interested to see if he ever was a high possession player , even in his junior years. Strikes me more as someone who would have a great two minute highlights reel and would have stood out for it at junior levels.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevoswan
    replied
    Originally posted by barry
    Best move for him. Doesnt hurt us.
    Not using him properly actually did hurt us....we wasted his talent. That hurts. Happy for him that he's found his niche at Geelong.....but I'm not happy for us.

    Leave a comment:

Working...