Rnd 19 Pre-Match Thread, vs Brisbane at the GABBA 1:10 PM Sunday 21 July 2024

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • KSAS
    replied
    Originally posted by KSAS
    Horse has said Mills is no certainty to play this week as he pulled up sore after his first game & is a watch. Played more minutes than planned due to J Mac's injury ( he was to be subbed off before 3/4 time).
    Bemused hearing commentary on SEN & Fox Footy tonight over their bewilderment on Mills being managed after just 1 game. Obviously they haven't listened to Horse's presser earlier this week.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevoswan
    replied
    But his getting off now makes Heeney's suspension look even more like plain vindictiveness from this joke of a league.
    Last edited by liz; 18 July 2024, 07:40 PM. Reason: Part of post responding to deleted post removed

    Leave a comment:


  • i'm-uninformed2
    replied
    I can’t believe I’m getting to my first live game of the year and my two man crushes, McInerney and Rowie, are out.

    I’m a 53yo man about to cry over football!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • KSAS
    replied
    I feel more angry at Heeney's suspension last week after hearing Charlie Cameron has been cleared to play on Sunday. Good luck to him, but even though different scenarios both were deemed unintentional (accidents). Heeney's accident caused a blood nose, 1 week suspension upheld and in illegible for Brownlow. Charlie's accident caused a concussion, 3 week suspension withdrawn and remains eligible for Brownlow. Next time we need to hire someone Adrian Anderson who has good a strike rate getting players off!

    Leave a comment:


  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    Originally posted by mcs
    There are some things we just shouldn't do in life.

    Like me daring to suggest to a few Fairypuppies fans on another forum today that they had a huge run of luck as part of their Premiership in 2016, alongside their terrific performances in that final series. Quickly reminded me why I hate that club and its excessively insecure fans.
    It suspect that they may have forgotten, that the AFL did actually apologise to the Swans after the grand final, because the umpiring wasn't up to standard.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcs
    replied
    Originally posted by Dow
    Some big outs this week - I hope both Mitchell and Warner play - doubt Francis or Reid will get a game unless there is another injury
    Can't see it happening, especially now "Good Bloke" is back in and ready for another bath from Harry.

    Not sure which way they'll go between Mitchell and Warner for sub however. Agree on Francis and Reid, but I do wonder if they will give Reid a game or two somewhere in the run in.... he looked in reasonable nick in the parts of the reserves game I caught last week.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dow
    replied
    Some big outs this week - I hope both Mitchell and Warner play - doubt Francis or Reid will get a game unless there is another injury

    Leave a comment:


  • mcs
    replied
    Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
    Yes, I actually did that years ago, but recently I've taken an interest again. Unfortunately, I think my mental health is suffering because of that unwise decision.
    There are some things we just shouldn't do in life.

    Like me daring to suggest to a few Fairypuppies fans on another forum today that they had a huge run of luck as part of their Premiership in 2016, alongside their terrific performances in that final series. Quickly reminded me why I hate that club and its excessively insecure fans.

    Leave a comment:


  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    Originally posted by mcs
    I gave up a long time trying to follow the logic across cases with the tribunal. What is said to be blue one week will be said to be orange the next and black the next.
    Yes, I actually did that years ago, but recently I've taken an interest again. Unfortunately, I think my mental health is suffering because of that unwise decision.

    Leave a comment:


  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    And it'll be interesting to see how the Bedford appeal goes. Personally I thought the Cameron tackle was a fair bit worse than Bedford's effort. I suspect that the GWS legal representative might now try much the same argument, but with the Tribunal being the Tribunal, they'll probably deny that the Cameron decision sets a precedent and dismiss the appeal.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcs
    replied
    So the rumours floating around about a bit about Rowy being injured were right. Mills, Rowy and and Macca of course all out.

    Cunningham and Heeney will clearly both come in, but be interesting who they go for out of the four on the extended list - Warner, Mitchell, Francis, and Sam Reid. Surely one of the midfield pair, but which one!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nico
    replied
    I guess the slam tackle is back.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcs
    replied
    Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
    Well, this is from the AFL site story on the decision.

    {Brisbane argued the Tribunal "put the cart before the horse" during Cameron's initial hearing by focusing on the Tribunal guidelines before determining whether the player had actually committed a reportable offence when tackling Duggan.

    "The Tribunal reasoned backward from the conduct to conclude the conduct had a certain character to it," Lions lawyer Chris Winneke said.}

    Which I guess is saying that because Duggan was is injured, the Tribunal wrongly decided that the tackle was illegal, rather than drawing the conclusion that the Duggan was unluckily injured in a legal tackle. Which I think is a reasonable argument, but it's bizarre that they have now accepted it, after they seem to have been ruling that sort of argument is unacceptable for years.
    I gave up a long time trying to follow the logic across cases with the tribunal. What is said to be blue one week will be said to be orange the next and black the next.

    Leave a comment:


  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    Originally posted by mcs
    Did they put up the 'good bloke' defence again.

    What a lottery the system is now.
    Well, this is from the AFL site story on the decision.

    {Brisbane argued the Tribunal "put the cart before the horse" during Cameron's initial hearing by focusing on the Tribunal guidelines before determining whether the player had actually committed a reportable offence when tackling Duggan.

    "The Tribunal reasoned backward from the conduct to conclude the conduct had a certain character to it," Lions lawyer Chris Winneke said.}

    Which I guess is saying that because Duggan was is injured, the Tribunal wrongly decided that the tackle was illegal, rather than drawing the conclusion that the Duggan was unluckily injured in a legal tackle. Which I think is a reasonable argument, but it's bizarre that they have now accepted it, after they seem to have been ruling that sort of argument is unacceptable for years.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcs
    replied
    Originally posted by The Big Cat
    Charlie Cameron free to play!
    Did they put up the 'good bloke' defence again.

    What a lottery the system is now.

    Leave a comment:

Working...