Andrew Ericksen

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • davo4030
    On the Rookie List
    • Dec 2004
    • 2

    #1

    Andrew Ericksen

    G'day fellas. I'm a new poster here. Just wondering what we all think of Ericksen?
    Given the fact that we got Jolly, i can't see him making much progress into the senior team this year, don't know how long we could afford to keep him on the list.
    Do you think the that LRT will be able to carry out any permanent rucking?
    Is Ericksen's skills any good?
    What do we think of the issue?
  • DST
    The voice of reason!
    • Jan 2003
    • 2705

    #2
    Re: Andrew Ericksen

    Originally posted by davo4030
    G'day fellas. I'm a new poster here. Just wondering what we all think of Ericksen?
    Given the fact that we got Jolly, i can't see him making much progress into the senior team this year, don't know how long we could afford to keep him on the list.
    Do you think the that LRT will be able to carry out any permanent rucking?
    Is Ericksen's skills any good?
    What do we think of the issue?
    Eriksen is our project player. If he shows enough improvement (and by all reports he has) he will be on our list for at least 3 or 4 years before being expected to play in the AFL.

    The recruiting of Jolly has no bearing on the progress of Ericksen.

    As for LRT, a full year playing at CHB/FB in either the canberra league or senior level if forms permits awaits him.

    DST


    "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

    Comment

    • footyhead
      Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
      • May 2003
      • 1367

      #3
      Re: Re: Andrew Ericksen

      [QUOT
      E]Originally posted by DST


      As for LRT, a full year playing at CHB/FB in either the canberra league or senior level if forms permits awaits him.

      DST


      [/B][/QUOTE]
      Are you trying to say that if LRT puts in a full year with the Swans reserves in Canberra, then he will have been deemd to have had a good year ??

      Comment

      • SWANSBEST
        On the Rookie List
        • Jan 2003
        • 868

        #4
        Ericksen is definately a project player. It has often been said that a ruckman as tall as Ericksen can take many years to develop to full potential . I think that Ericksen certaintly won't be an exception. Trouble is that I may not be around long enough to see him come of age as an AFL player. IMO he has a long way to go.
        WMP

        Comment

        • DST
          The voice of reason!
          • Jan 2003
          • 2705

          #5
          Re: Re: Re: Andrew Ericksen

          Originally posted by footyhead
          [QUOT
          E]Originally posted by DST


          As for LRT, a full year playing at CHB/FB in either the canberra league or senior level if forms permits awaits him.

          DST


          Are you trying to say that if LRT puts in a full year with the Swans reserves in Canberra, then he will have been deemd to have had a good year ?? [/B][/QUOTE]

          It would not be a total loss if he played a full year in Canberra at CHB, as he has not played that much football in his junior years. A full year learning the game at CHB in Canberra can only benefit him.

          But this is very unlikely as if he is fit and playing decent footy then he will be playing senior football by virtue of us not having a tall defender to slot into CHB.

          DST
          "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

          Comment

          • caj23
            Senior Player
            • Aug 2003
            • 2462

            #6
            Re: Re: Re: Re: Andrew Ericksen

            Originally posted by DST
            Are you trying to say that if LRT puts in a full year with the Swans reserves in Canberra, then he will have been deemd to have had a good year ??
            It would not be a total loss if he played a full year in Canberra at CHB, as he has not played that much football in his junior years. A full year learning the game at CHB in Canberra can only benefit him.

            But this is very unlikely as if he is fit and playing decent footy then he will be playing senior football by virtue of us not having a tall defender to slot into CHB.

            DST
            [/B][/QUOTE]

            Can't believe i'm agreeing with Footyhead here , but in my view it would be a major step backwards if LRT spends most of the year playing in Canberra.

            He has shown enough to suggest that he is not completely out of place at senior level and given our shortage of key position players we desparately need him to step up in 2005

            Getting back to the original topic, Ericksen will certainly be given another full year in Canberra.

            If he has bulked up and improved sufficiently he will retain his spot in 2006 and may even be nearly ready for a senior game or two by then. We are just going to have to be patient with him
            Last edited by caj23; 1 December 2004, 10:41 PM.

            Comment

            • sharp9
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2003
              • 2508

              #7
              Re: Andrew Ericksen

              Originally posted by davo4030
              G'day fellas. I'm a new poster here. Just wondering what we all think of Ericksen?
              Welcome, Andrew....do keep on coming to get all the goss on you and your mates!
              "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

              Comment

              • filthpig
                On the Rookie List
                • Oct 2004
                • 26

                #8
                id say he will get a chance in '06, unless of course we have a shocking year next year and decide to just debut a bunch of youngsters, or if there are many injuries.
                mp

                Comment

                • sfan
                  Warming the Bench
                  • May 2003
                  • 487

                  #9
                  Where is Andrew Ericksen up to in the pecking order of things. I know he is listed as having a shoulder injury at the moment but given he has now been around for 2-3 years is he any closer to being a real backup ruckman?

                  Comment

                  • Ruckman
                    Ego alta, ergo ictus
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 3990

                    #10
                    Originally posted by sfan
                    Where is Andrew Ericksen up to in the pecking order of things. I know he is listed as having a shoulder injury at the moment but given he has now been around for 2-3 years is he any closer to being a real backup ruckman?
                    Nope

                    Comment

                    • adnar
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Oct 2004
                      • 425

                      #11
                      Originally posted by sfan
                      Where is Andrew Ericksen up to in the pecking order of things. I know he is listed as having a shoulder injury at the moment but given he has now been around for 2-3 years is he any closer to being a real backup ruckman?
                      Jolly
                      .
                      Chambers
                      .
                      .
                      Shaw
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      .
                      Ericksen
                      .
                      Rowe

                      Comment

                      • Ruckman
                        Ego alta, ergo ictus
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 3990

                        #12
                        It's a moot point anyway
                        The kids gone for half the season, and as for poor Donk . . .

                        Comment

                        • goswannie14
                          Leadership Group
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 11166

                          #13
                          Originally posted by adnar
                          Jolly
                          .
                          Chambers
                          .
                          .
                          Shaw
                          .
                          .
                          .
                          .
                          .
                          Ericksen
                          .
                          Rowe
                          What happened to Doyle, or are you just presuming he will miss most of the season injured again?
                          Does God believe in Atheists?

                          Comment

                          • adnar
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Oct 2004
                            • 425

                            #14
                            Originally posted by goswannie14
                            What happened to Doyle, or are you just presuming he will miss most of the season injured again?
                            Meant to put him right after Chambers.

                            Comment

                            • Nico
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 11536

                              #15
                              Headlines in 2020.

                              Project player set to play his first game.

                              10 times Premiership coach Paul Roos said .......
                              http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                              Comment

                              Working...