Why are the Swans not bidding for the AFLW?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Beerman
    replied
    I do find it disappointing that we aren't launching an immediate bid, but I don't know enough about football administration and what it takes to run a club (including a men's team, a women's team and the academies) to know just how achievable it is. I know from my own work experience that there are always really great opportunities that have to be shelved because of a lack of resources, and that often people are not very happy about that.

    Besides, what's wrong with women in Sydney playing for GWS? (Mods - please, please don't ban me! ) It would be great if Sydney (the city) had two teams, but at least we have one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Meg
    replied
    "At least two clubs ? and possibly four ? will be given the green light to join the AFLW in 2019."

    "The AFL received bids from Essendon, Geelong, Gold Coast, Hawthorn, North Melbourne, Richmond, St Kilda and West Coast by the Friday afternoon deadline."

    "The Sydney Swans made a submission indicating an interest in fielding a team in the future, providing they can provide appropriate training and administrative facilities."

    Eight clubs submit bids for AFLW in 2019 - AFL.com.au

    Leave a comment:


  • Sandridge
    replied
    Originally posted by Meg
    That match was the one of a series of women's exhibition matches last year, with the two teams for the Sydney game representing the best female talent in New South Wales and ACT (plus several American women who were putting themselves forward for consideration for the AFLW draft)). So I think both teams were formed by putting together a combination of women players drawn from various NSW and ACT clubs. That is, the players on the day for both teams didn't usually play together at the same club.

    If you want to see who made up the Swans team, then the names and the clubs they came from are listed here:

    Meet your women's team - sydneyswans.com.au
    Big thanks Meg!

    Leave a comment:


  • aardvark
    replied
    I have absolutely no problem with the clubs approach. The Academy is excellent news. What disappoints me is there are 2-3 excellent prospects in the NSW U/18 girls this year that will now have 10 year careers with GWS and that will keep happening until we get a team.

    Leave a comment:


  • baskin
    replied
    I believe the club has been upfront with the situation from the start. I also believe that even if we did put in a bid at the beginning of the process we would not have been granted a team. It was always going to go to GWS.

    Leave a comment:


  • barry
    replied
    Originally posted by aardvark
    Over 70,000 new female registrations this year around Australia. Shouldn't be too hard to find 300 to fill 10 teams.
    Whisper is down here in footy land that the first expansion could well be another 8 teams.
    Going to 18 teams has very high logistical problems
    - cost
    - talent
    - time ( how to fit in more games)
    - support

    Won't be 10 years at least, at best.

    Leave a comment:


  • Meg
    replied
    Originally posted by Sandridge
    Last year, I travelled up from Melbourne to see the Bloods play GWS. (Possibly the year before?)
    The curtain raiser was a women's game between the Swans and Giants. Swans won!
    I was therefore surprised when we didn't apply for one of the original licenses.
    Is anyone able to tell me where the women who represented us that day came from? Was it a representative side from a local competition?

    That match was the one of a series of women's exhibition matches last year, with the two teams for the Sydney game representing the best female talent in New South Wales and ACT (plus several American women who were putting themselves forward for consideration for the AFLW draft)). So I think both teams were formed by putting together a combination of women players drawn from various NSW and ACT clubs. That is, the players on the day for both teams didn't usually play together at the same club.

    If you want to see who made up the Swans team, then the names and the clubs they came from are listed here:

    Meet your women's team - sydneyswans.com.au

    Leave a comment:


  • Sandridge
    replied
    Last year, I travelled up from Melbourne to see the Bloods play GWS. (Possibly the year before?)
    The curtain raiser was a women's game between the Swans and Giants. Swans won!
    I was therefore surprised when we didn't apply for one of the original licenses.
    Is anyone able to tell me where the women who represented us that day came from? Was it a representative side from a local competition?

    Leave a comment:


  • robamiee
    replied
    first exp will only be 2-4 clubs...
    afl knows it is on a winner however it also knows that the elite talent has to be built up, so that the games from a quality point of view get better..Hence why it deferred the expansion for 1 year.
    Elite comp cant have teams kicking 20 points of less and while it is great they get elite talent from other sports, growing the game from grassroots is the key, thus improving the overall game which will attract more sponsors and more players
    So a slow careful expansion is what the AFL will do to ensure its doesnt get killed off from itself..

    Leave a comment:


  • aardvark
    replied
    Originally posted by barry
    I don't think the AFLW will ever get to 18 teams, so the swans have probably missed out all together.
    Over 70,000 new female registrations this year around Australia. Shouldn't be too hard to find 300 to fill 10 teams.
    Whisper is down here in footy land that the first expansion could well be another 8 teams.

    Leave a comment:


  • barry
    replied
    I don't think the AFLW will ever get to 18 teams, so the swans have probably missed out all together.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Originally posted by Mug Punter
    So, starting an elite level development programme for women players via the Academy is just lip service for you is it?

    I take the club at their word re their commitment long term but I'd prefer us to do it properly.

    Some people are never happy and always looking for something to whinge about, then again if you want to get your knickers in a knot over this in Abu Dhabi then knock yourself out...
    If the Andrew Ireland came to work tomorrow and decided that it was a priority it would get done.

    I don't like the idea that in 100 years the Swans will be known as the last team that permitted women to play in the AFL. What's so wrong with believing the club should be leading the way on this issue?

    Not sure what geography has to do with it. Only people from where ever you are can have an opinion?

    Leave a comment:


  • Meg
    replied
    Why are the Swans not bidding for the AFLW?

    Might be worth re-visiting statements the club has made about its objective of having a dedicated training facility in the Moore Park vicinity. This just before the 2017 season:

    "Sydney Swans chief executive and managing director Andrew Ireland says the Club is continuing to push ahead with plans to build a new training and administration base."

    "Ireland said the building would be world class and was one of the key priorities for the Club off the field in 2017."

    Swans search for new base - sydneyswans.com.au

    And this article from 2016 also has some relevant commentary and quotes from Andrew Ireland:

    "..... it has emerged the club is searching Sydney for a venue that can be redeveloped to stage matches for their reserves side in the NEAFL competition and also be a home for their Academy and a possible women's team. It could also be used for preseason training, though the club's preferred position is to keep its training and administration base within the Moore Park precinct."

    Sydney Swans, AFL eye Henson Park as home for 'elite second-tier' facility

    Leave a comment:


  • Mug Punter
    replied
    Originally posted by Bloody Hell
    I agree 100%

    The Swans aren't ready? Why not? Did the idea come out of the blue without warning?

    The reason they aren't ready is because it isn't a priority for the club. They are paying the idea lip service only. I had an idea of our club as a leader in the competition, but clearly I am wrong.

    I find it difficult to accept that the Swans are the worst (or 2nd worst) equipped club in the competition to field a women's team.
    So, starting an elite level development programme for women players via the Academy is just lip service for you is it?

    I take the club at their word re their commitment long term but I'd prefer us to do it properly.

    Some people are never happy and always looking for something to whinge about, then again if you want to get your knickers in a knot over this in Abu Dhabi then knock yourself out...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloody Hell
    replied
    Originally posted by monopoly19
    I think it's embarrassing and disappointing that the Swans are one of just two teams that aren't interested. I doubt the other 16 teams all have the best facilities but they have made it work or are at least willing to try. The Lions - one of the grand finalists from this years comp - are still looking for an appropriate ground for their team. Would the players and supporters rather they waited until they had one? I doubt it after the season they've just had. The AFLW generated a huge amount of interest and goodwill for the AFL and the Swans are choosing to be left behind, and are leaving their members who would love to support a women's team stranded.
    I agree 100%

    The Swans aren't ready? Why not? Did the idea come out of the blue without warning?

    The reason they aren't ready is because it isn't a priority for the club. They are paying the idea lip service only. I had an idea of our club as a leader in the competition, but clearly I am wrong.

    I find it difficult to accept that the Swans are the worst (or 2nd worst) equipped club in the competition to field a women's team.

    Leave a comment:

Working...