Even though I think Thompson has overstepped the mark, we don't know how common this is in the AFL. You're admitting Davis is a required player?
Where is the evidence to the contrary? Davis said with his own mouth that he is committed to the club, so how is that disinformation? His manager may be sounding out other clubs because of fears the club will delist him.
This is the most erroneous claim of all. Kids follow teams for a variety of reasons. As I said his Dad played at Collingwood when Nick was a toddler and at Sydney for 9 games only when he was 8. Nick may not have even been interested in the game then. If it was anything like my school, AFL held little interest in the playgrounds of Sydney back then.The Eagle story is either true and i do find it somewhat unusual and interesting that a kid whose dad played for Collingwood (with distinction) and the Bloods followed a WA side that were easybeats at the time and who he possibly never saw at a match or it is bull and the story was planted to ingratiate himself to a potential employer.
Not sure how you can claim the Eagles were 'easybeats'. Didn't they win 2 flags in the early 1990s when Nick probably started following the game? The Eagles rise coincided with a very low point for the Swans.
It shows nothing of the sort.Either way the story is interesting in regard to Davis obvious lack of committment to the club.
You should heed your own advice!There are a lot of issues here that no one who doesn't know Davis cant or shouldnt comment on.
Bookmarks