Negligent conduct..one point...low impact one and high contact two means a week..early plea will mean a reprimand and points towards next offence!
Guerra gets one match after rough conduct against malceski..two reduced to one for early plea.
Hodge nothing for hit on Goodes.
Last edited by royboy42; 9th August 2010 at 05:59 PM.
So it should be, if hodge had of gone for that then we have big problems in this game.Originally Posted by royboy42
Wow I am very happy (and relieved) at that! I must admit looking at the incident I thought we may be without Jack for 1-2 weeks.
Swannies for life!
On the replay I saw that's a good result. Maybe leniency shown as a square up for the Mummy disgrace.
..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC
Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN
He did get a week, but good behaviour and an early plea reduces the sentence.
When comparing suspensions with other players you need to take into account whether they have a good record and whether they contested the charge or not.
DST
"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"
Take it and run Jack. Just keep on running like you did on Saturday.
Does he actually qualify for a "good behaviour" discount? You have to have been in the system for a certain number of years before that kicks in, and I suspect Jack is on the cusp of qualifying or not.
I would think you have a good behaviour discount from the start of your career until you get suspended.
The years would only come into play after you get a suspension and then drop off after a certain period.
DST
"Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"
Phew !!
That is a great result for Jack and for the Swans. Hope he accepts.
That's not the way it works. You have to have an X year clean record to get the good behaviour discount. If you've been in the system fewer than X years you don't get it. I just can't recall off the top of my head what X is. If I had to hazard a guess I would say probably 5. Jack was drafted in the 2005 rookie draft, which means this is his 5th year. So he doesn't quite have a 5 year clean record.
The report says "He has no existing good or bad record"
The first thing I thought when I saw the Guerra tackle was I wonder if it will receive the same scrutiny that Mumford's received - seems it has. I still think two weeks is a bit rough (for both Mumford and Guerra) though.
up the guts
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks