Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 172

Thread: Changes for Round 19

  1. #13
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    4,010
    I doubt they'll replace Sinclair with Nankervis at this point, particularly given their respective experience and also noting it sounded like Nankervis picked up an injury on Saturday. Having said that, Sinclair needs to pick up his game.

    I thought Cunningham was OK. His disposal efficiency (75%) was better than most, and he got himself in space quite often. His speed will be valuable at Subiaco.

    I suspect it will be McVeigh for Foote, if he's recovered, otherwise no changes.

  2. #14
    Why oh why the love for mcveigh?. He gets found out against pressure and will be a liability in the finals

  3. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    Why oh why the love for mcveigh?. He gets found out against pressure and will be a liability in the finals
    He's been a regular in our best after a slow start ( no pre season or reserves matches to find touch mind you) before getting injured. You seriously think he adds nothing to our team at his best ( which he was close to over the past month or so)


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Melbourne_Blood View Post
    He's been a regular in our best after a slow start ( no pre season or reserves matches to find touch mind you) before getting injured. You seriously think he adds nothing to our team at his best ( which he was close to over the past month or so)


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Are you sure?. I don't see any votes for mcveigh in the coaches award.

    He has shown nothing this year to warrant displacing anyone in our defense against carlton.

    Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk

  5. #17
    Warming the Bench
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Portland, Vic. ex Geelong
    Posts
    260
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    Why oh why the love for mcveigh?. He gets found out against pressure and will be a liability in the finals
    I'd add K.Jack to this. I believe our captaincy arrangement is poor. They both show little leadership at crunch-time.
    Why are McVeigh & Jack co-captains? Suspect it's because they're from north of the Murray.
    IMO - Kennedy s/b sole captain.

  6. #18
    Can you feel it? Site Admin ugg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chucked into the ruck
    Posts
    15,949
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    Are you sure?. I don't see any votes for mcveigh in the coaches award.
    Look harder

  7. #19
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11,188
    Quote Originally Posted by MattW View Post
    I doubt they'll replace Sinclair with Nankervis at this point, particularly given their respective experience and also noting it sounded like Nankervis picked up an injury on Saturday. Having said that, Sinclair needs to pick up his game.

    I thought Cunningham was OK. His disposal efficiency (75%) was better than most, and he got himself in space quite often. His speed will be valuable at Subiaco.

    I suspect it will be McVeigh for Foote, if he's recovered, otherwise no changes.
    Cunningham only gets a touch against lesser sides. Hard ball gets not in repertoire.

  8. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by ugg View Post
    Look harder
    How many votes ?


    Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk

  9. #21
    Can you feel it? Site Admin ugg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chucked into the ruck
    Posts
    15,949
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    How many votes ?


    Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk
    11

  10. #22
    Can you feel it? Site Admin ugg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chucked into the ruck
    Posts
    15,949
    Quote Originally Posted by MattW View Post
    I doubt they'll replace Sinclair with Nankervis at this point, particularly given their respective experience and also noting it sounded like Nankervis picked up an injury on Saturday. Having said that, Sinclair needs to pick up his game.

    I thought Cunningham was OK. His disposal efficiency (75%) was better than most, and he got himself in space quite often. His speed will be valuable at Subiaco.

    I suspect it will be McVeigh for Foote, if he's recovered, otherwise no changes.
    Nankervis did go off for treatment but came back on and finished the game.

    I noticed while watching the seniors replay that there was a stage midway in Q2 that both Naismith and Sinclair were shown on the bench, with Towers rucking. Sinclair at that stage hadn't contested a ruck contest in that 2nd quarter. Was he injured? He looked like he was strapping on some massive shin guards.

  11. #23
    pr. dim-melb; m not f
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Coast NSW, Costa Lantana
    Posts
    6,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Nico View Post
    Cunningham only gets a touch against lesser sides. Hard ball gets not in repertoire.
    I thought it was a case of hard ball gets not in job description, which I think is more like collect ball from hard ball getters, kick to leading forward/s. He is one of our better kicks for accuracy.
    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

  12. #24
    Veterans List Ludwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    9,324
    Quote Originally Posted by ugg View Post
    Nankervis did go off for treatment but came back on and finished the game.

    I noticed while watching the seniors replay that there was a stage midway in Q2 that both Naismith and Sinclair were shown on the bench, with Towers rucking. Sinclair at that stage hadn't contested a ruck contest in that 2nd quarter. Was he injured? He looked like he was strapping on some massive shin guards.
    Sinclair has had the lowest TOG % in the past 2 games, with the exception of the injured Zak Jones, 66 and 61, respectively. That'pretty low for any player. I also noticed that he had those patella tendinitis straps on both knees. We'd probably like to use him in Perth on a ground he's familiar with, but I think he's got knee problems and is struggling. If Nanka is fit, I'd prefer him to Naismith. The ground is likely to be wet with rain predicted for the weekend and I think those conditions suit Nankervis better.

Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO