Whatever the side that is selected (and I can see a late change on the way), I'm hoping that this is the line-in-the-sand game for the Swannies. There's normally one every year, after which we start playing half decent football.
Whatever the side that is selected (and I can see a late change on the way), I'm hoping that this is the line-in-the-sand game for the Swannies. There's normally one every year, after which we start playing half decent football.
It is quite a dry day today; low dew point. Perhaps it won't be as greasy.Originally Posted by caj23
Only one Giants emergency is sitting out the NEAFL - Buntine which would suggest Davis is right to play
Hope Buddy runs him around!
Davis is out but so is Buddy! Ronke and Buntine in
Looking for Ronke to match his MCG performance against Hawthorn with Buddy out.
Well, with Buddy out it will be good practice to learn how to score without him......or it could mean we just score 5 goals for the match instead of 8.
BTW, I wonder which team announced their change first and if the second announcement made in reaction to the first? It appears Davis was out then the Swans decided to rest Buddy.....wonder what his issue is? Groin?
Last edited by stevoswan; 27th April 2019 at 07:29 PM.
Bizarre suggestion. Do you really think the Swans would “rest” Buddy just because Davis is out? (Or vice versa?)
So all those talls were because Buddy was in doubt!
Bit disappointed that you didn't do the, 'do you want the good news, or do you want the bad news?' routine.
I didn't suggest it....I asked a question. I was after discussion, not a scolding....and certainly with Davis doubtful in the lead up, they may well have rested him knowing Buddy wasn't playing. Do you think the Giants actually believe we could beat them without Buddy or even with him? I doubt it.
Both teams submit their team sheets at the same time.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks