Changes for Round 18 V Western Bulldogs
Collapse
X
-
Wouldnt be surprised to see Kennelly miss a week at least, a couple of times the other night the ball went past his bad side and normally he could have punched it but he didnt even put his arm up.Leave a comment:
-
Manuka is bigger than the MCG!
That said, if Malceski can be brought straight back in following radical knee surgery than I can't see why the best runner at the club would have to come back through the reserves.Leave a comment:
-
How far off is Fosdike? Do you think they could risk bringing him back in to play on a smaller ground like Manuka?Leave a comment:
-
Playfair looks like the Mummy so it's likely that any injury he has is a recurring one!!Leave a comment:
-
-
Is Malceski's calf at all related to his his knee injury?? or is it the other leg?Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Who played full game in reserves this week (and stood out )? No point specualting changes on possible injured and or out of form playersLeave a comment:
-
-
We haven't had an 'old style thrashing' since 2004 and it won't happen this week.I'm not sure on what you base your confidence on. Perhaps a full strength Swans side but not one decimated through injury.
In recent years the Swans have relied on a very small injury list to stay among the top teams. Roos himself has said on the weekend that you need a healthy team to be competitive. We clearly aren't healthy at the moment and don't have the depth to cover.
On Sunday we face the prospect of missing about a third of our best 22 players - Goodes, MOL, Malceski, Leo, Playfair, Davis and Buchanan (susp). Add to the list the fact that ROK is playing injured (although still producing career best football), Kennelly must be far from 100% and who knows who else.
The Dogs aren't stuttering as bad as some on here seem to think. There's no shame in losing to Geelong and Carton were red hot in the last quarter yesterday.
We've got a shocking record against Adelaide and Roos fails to change anything against them and Collingwood. In my opinion, we lost to the Crows because of the way we played, not because of the personnel. You'll see a totally different game this week and we might actually get something out of Hall.
Sure, the injuries are a concern but I think we'll still have enough good players to get home.
We've got a good record in Canberra and against the 'Dogs. They were very flat in the 2nd half yesterday and look ripe for the picking.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
I'm not sure on what you base your confidence on. Perhaps a full strength Swans side but not one decimated through injury.
In recent years the Swans have relied on a very small injury list to stay among the top teams. Roos himself has said on the weekend that you need a healthy team to be competitive. We clearly aren't healthy at the moment and don't have the depth to cover.
On Sunday we face the prospect of missing about a third of our best 22 players - Goodes, MOL, Malceski, Leo, Playfair, Davis and Buchanan (susp). Add to the list the fact that ROK is playing injured (although still producing career best football), Kennelly must be far from 100% and who knows who else.
The Dogs aren't stuttering as bad as some on here seem to think. There's no shame in losing to Geelong and Carton were red hot in the last quarter yesterday.Leave a comment:
-


Leave a comment: