Goodbye Tadhg!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • satchmopugdog
    replied
    I miss him....

    Leave a comment:


  • The Big Cat
    replied

    He's not ruling out a return to the Swans in some capacity, but not as a player.
    Where does it say "not as a player"

    Leave a comment:


  • Cheer Squad
    replied
    Not gone for good?

    Kennelly treasures his homecoming - realfooty.com.au

    He's not ruling out a return to the Swans in some capacity, but not as a player.

    Leave a comment:


  • AnnieH
    replied
    Small paragraph in yesterday's Sun-Herald in the "real estate gossip" pages ... Tige is not selling his Sydney home, he's just dropped the rent he's asking from $1200 per week to $1100 per week.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Magoo
    replied
    If you cant get a decent trade for Okeefe then forget worrying about what you would now or would have in the past gotten for Kennelly.

    As someone mentioned the in an earlier post, he's retired from AFL, forget it and move on. The situation is no different than Ben Graham retiring to play American Football. He was still able to play AFL but left to pursue another career in another field. The only problem with the entire matter was his timing.

    He should have either retired when lists werent finalised or had the fortitude to play out the season.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cant turn right
    replied
    Let's just pretend for a moment that he's not from Ireland but somewhere closer to north bondi. Would the swans have got that many more playing years out of his shoulder, groin and knees and anything else we don't know about? I don't think so. Perhaps his value to the swans could be in recruiting more top class geldings.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nico
    replied
    Originally posted by Bas
    Just because someone knows it to be a fact doesn't make it a fact unless it was properly released in the public domain.

    We can guess there was an alleged contract, it was allegedly broken and compensation would have been allegedly paid. If not, I'm sure we would have heard more about it. All parties happy with outcome.

    Going back to the the uncompensated matter that has been creating a wedge between Swan supporters, I thought of the following analogy:

    Drafting Irish players on your list is like a horse racing syndicate running geldings. They can make you alot of money whilst racing but once their career is over, their value equates to a can of pet food.

    There is the problem, does a Club get greedy and ""milk"" the gelding for all his worth and then be left with nothing, or should they trade the player whilst at his peak for a younger player who has demonstrated that he might be a 200 gamer? This is based on the assumption the player will not play on to retirement at 30 yrs plus.

    We wouldn't have this result if we traded Kennelly at the end of 2007. The Swans knew he would not play to retirement age.

    I feel sorry for Murphy now because he has become tainted in all this after what his two countrymen have done.
    And Setanta makes 3.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinkemu
    replied
    Originally posted by Bas
    Just because someone knows it to be a fact doesn't make it a fact unless it was properly released in the public domain.
    You said it

    Leave a comment:


  • liz
    replied
    Originally posted by Bas
    We wouldn't have this result if we traded Kennelly at the end of 2007. The Swans knew he would not play to retirement age.

    I feel sorry for Murphy now because he has become tainted in all this after what his two countrymen have done.
    Kennelly was untradeable at the end of 2007 for precisely that reason, though. No other club is going to give up something of value if they know what they are getting is about to give the game up.

    I don't see how Murphy is "tainted" at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScottH
    replied
    Originally posted by Bas
    Just because someone knows it to be a fact doesn't make it a fact unless it was properly released in the public domain.

    We can guess there was an alleged contract, it was allegedly broken and compensation would have been allegedly paid. If not, I'm sure we would have heard more about it. All parties happy with outcome.
    Allegedly!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bas
    replied
    Originally posted by ScottH
    I heard today from a source, that it was true. But that still makes it hearsay.
    Just because someone knows it to be a fact doesn't make it a fact unless it was properly released in the public domain.

    We can guess there was an alleged contract, it was allegedly broken and compensation would have been allegedly paid. If not, I'm sure we would have heard more about it. All parties happy with outcome.

    Going back to the the uncompensated matter that has been creating a wedge between Swan supporters, I thought of the following analogy:

    Drafting Irish players on your list is like a horse racing syndicate running geldings. They can make you alot of money whilst racing but once their career is over, their value equates to a can of pet food.

    There is the problem, does a Club get greedy and ""milk"" the gelding for all his worth and then be left with nothing, or should they trade the player whilst at his peak for a younger player who has demonstrated that he might be a 200 gamer? This is based on the assumption the player will not play on to retirement at 30 yrs plus.

    We wouldn't have this result if we traded Kennelly at the end of 2007. The Swans knew he would not play to retirement age.

    I feel sorry for Murphy now because he has become tainted in all this after what his two countrymen have done.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScottH
    replied
    Originally posted by Bas
    There was never any evidence that there was a contract except for hearsay.
    I heard today from a source, that it was true. But that still makes it hearsay.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bas
    replied
    Originally posted by ScottH
    Speaking of contract breaking by players, anyone gunna bring up the "Wallace contract"?

    There was never any evidence that there was a contract except for hearsay.

    Having said that, it seems neither side was aggrieved by the eventual outcome.

    I think it was the singing dog that did it for the Swans Management.

    Turn up the sound and you'll hear the A380's and 747's in the background of Kenellys 1 minute whatever you call it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScottH
    replied
    Speaking of contract breaking by players, anyone gunna bring up the "Wallace contract"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bas
    replied
    [QUOTE=ShockOfHair;426306]
    I've seen it reported that Kennelly has said, with reference to the Swans, that there's an inevitable "levelling off" after you win a flag. If that's what he's said, it's pretty accurate and hardly dissing the Bloods. QUOTE]

    Except that we won it in 2005 and it is now 2009. Well and truly flatlined by now.

    Poor player management to be flatlining in 09 i that case.

    I don't think that there is any greater "levelling off"in 09 than what there was in 08 or 07.

    Leave a comment:

Working...