Changes for Rnd 4 V Fremantle

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • aguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Meg
    More like an Exocet missile the way Benny goes at the ball.
    What an excellent sub

    Leave a comment:


  • Meg
    replied
    More like an Exocet missile the way Benny goes at the ball.

    Leave a comment:


  • satchmopugdog
    replied
    Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
    So, is that a midget sub for Anzac Day?
    I chuckled

    Leave a comment:


  • Kelpie_X
    replied
    Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
    Midfields are pretty evenly matched, either group could be better on their day. I think if we get enough supply they could struggle to cope with Buddy and Tippett ( and Heeney of course) . No Ballantyne and No Crowley hurts them. It should be a good game but if we play at our best I think we're a better team.
    I think they are playing better without Crowley. It's given them a more attacking style I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    Originally posted by aguy
    Good choice. That was my pick too. Mcglynn offers grunt and a change of height as sub. Also good for him to be managed a little coming back from his injuries
    So, is that a midget sub for Anzac Day?

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying South
    replied
    Originally posted by Doctor
    We have done this before on trips to Perth. Hiscox has been playing regularly in the reserves so they'd rather the guys closer to the first team get a full game at home rather than fly all the way over there and not play. Towers is the obvious inclusion if there's an injury.
    Thanks Doc and Ampersand. Your thoughts make sense and I am feeling a little less bewildered. Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • Doctor
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying South
    So let me get this straight. If we have a couple of late outs, then Hiscox will come into the team. Not Mitchell. Not Jones. Not Robinson. I have absolutely no idea.
    We have done this before on trips to Perth. Hiscox has been playing regularly in the reserves so they'd rather the guys closer to the first team get a full game at home rather than fly all the way over there and not play. Towers is the obvious inclusion if there's an injury.

    Leave a comment:


  • Go Swannies
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man
    For me the interesting thing is the battle of the coaches. Both seem to have the same intensity of the Roos era but even Lyon seems to have added a more offensive element to the game plan.

    Is there any 'history' between them from their time together under Roos?
    I've thought it was the other way around. Lyons has just taken the Roos defensive game to the Saints and now Freo while Horse developed better rebound attack a couple of years ago. But obviously Freo has now developed better attack for this season as they worked out they just weren't kicking enough goals. So we are a couple of years ahead of him, I reckon.

    Leave a comment:


  • ugg
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man
    For me the interesting thing is the battle of the coaches. Both seem to have the same intensity of the Roos era but even Lyon seems to have added a more offensive element to the game plan.

    Is there any 'history' between them from their time together under Roos?
    IIRC Longmire was the favourite for the Saints job but the Saints plumped for Lyon instead on the back of his presentation

    Leave a comment:


  • bloodbrother
    replied
    swans by 18 , our mids will win the battle

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    For me the interesting thing is the battle of the coaches. Both seem to have the same intensity of the Roos era but even Lyon seems to have added a more offensive element to the game plan.

    Is there any 'history' between them from their time together under Roos?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    For me

    Leave a comment:


  • Ampersand
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying South
    So let me get this straight. If we have a couple of late outs, then Hiscox will come into the team. Not Mitchell. Not Jones. Not Robinson. I have absolutely no idea.
    I understand your frustration but you'd think that if we get a late injury then Towers would come in ahead of Hiscox. If a tall goes down then Naismith gets a call up. Being a third string emergency for an interstate game isn't exactly the honor you suppose and isn't really indicative of the pecking order.

    I've come to the conclusion that Mitchell and, to a lesser extent, Jones have been tasked by the coaching staff with demonstrating that they are rounding out their game and the only way they can do that is by playing regularly in the reserves. Like Goodes, naming them as emergencies (or sub) for interstate games actually denies them a chance to prove themselves and robs them of valuable match fitness and touch.

    If Shaw runs into poor form I think Jones will get a shot. If we get a midfield injury, Mitchell is the obvious call up. Until then, it's hard to tinker with a winning formula, especially when you haven't had a loss.

    Leave a comment:


  • aguy
    replied
    Originally posted by O'Reilly Boy
    McGlynn as sub for mine. Rohan needs a whole game for maximum impact. Swans by 13.
    Good choice. That was my pick too. Mcglynn offers grunt and a change of height as sub. Also good for him to be managed a little coming back from his injuries

    Leave a comment:


  • O'Reilly Boy
    replied
    McGlynn as sub for mine. Rohan needs a whole game for maximum impact. Swans by 13.

    Leave a comment:

Working...