Swans v Blues Live Match thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bangalore Swans
    replied
    Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
    Eddie Betts is like that.

    After he retires, I expect the medal for Goal of the Year will be named after him.
    Seems like a brilliant bloke and he’s a joy to watch on the football field. I was saying how amazing his goal was at home.

    Leave a comment:


  • Markwebbos
    replied
    Originally posted by Go Swannies
    Agree. So is the call of touched. There were at least three cases when the ball was called touched and the player didn't clearly hear it - Luke Parker's was the most obvious. Imagine if that was in the noise of a GF.
    At least the umpires evened up the HTB against Parker with one the other way.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Big Cat
    replied
    Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
    Eddie Betts is like that.

    After he retires, I expect the medal for Goal of the Year will be named after him.
    He and Harry seemed to be having a good time out there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thunder Shaker
    replied
    Originally posted by Agent 86
    Was sitting right behind this one - not often that i applaud a goal to the other side, but sometimes you just find yourself clapping.
    Eddie Betts is like that.

    After he retires, I expect the medal for Goal of the Year will be named after him.

    Leave a comment:


  • liz
    replied
    Originally posted by MattW
    Heeney 5,5
    Cripps 3,3
    Lloyd 4
    McKay 4
    Cunningham 2,1
    Kennedy 2
    Papley 1
    Could be
    Heeney 5,5
    Cripps 4,2
    Lloyd or McKay 4,0
    Lloyd or Mckay 3,1
    Cunningham 3,0
    Kennedy 2,0
    Papley 1,0

    I think. Unless my arithmetic isn't working this afternoon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Agent 86
    replied
    Originally posted by Faunac8
    Have to admire the skill in Eddies goal potential GOTW
    Was sitting right behind this one - not often that i applaud a goal to the other side, but sometimes you just find yourself clapping.

    Leave a comment:


  • ugg
    replied
    Originally posted by MattW
    Heeney 5,5
    Cripps 3,3
    Lloyd 4
    McKay 4
    Cunningham 2,1
    Kennedy 2
    Papley 1
    Or possibly

    Heeney 5-5
    Cripps 4-2
    Lloyd, McKay one had 3-1, the other 4-0
    Cunningham 3-0
    Kennedy 2-0
    Papley 1-0

    Leave a comment:


  • MattW
    replied
    Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
    Coaches votes for the match.

    10 Isaac Heeney (SYD)
    6 Patrick Cripps (CARL)
    4 Jake Lloyd (SYD)
    4 Harry McKay (CARL)
    3 Harry Cunningham (SYD)
    2 Josh Kennedy (SYD)
    1 Tom Papley (SYD)

    Seems about right, although I would probably swap Lloyd and Cunningham. And maybe had Mills getting a vote or two.
    Heeney 5,5
    Cripps 3,3
    Lloyd 4
    McKay 4
    Cunningham 2,1
    Kennedy 2
    Papley 1

    Leave a comment:


  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    Coaches votes for the match.

    10 Isaac Heeney (SYD)
    6 Patrick Cripps (CARL)
    4 Jake Lloyd (SYD)
    4 Harry McKay (CARL)
    3 Harry Cunningham (SYD)
    2 Josh Kennedy (SYD)
    1 Tom Papley (SYD)

    Seems about right, although I would probably swap Lloyd and Cunningham. And maybe had Mills getting a vote or two.

    Leave a comment:


  • i'm-uninformed2
    replied
    Originally posted by stellation
    Most importantly- did anyone else notice just how good a hair day Dane was having? Outstanding!
    Does he ever not? Like, Dane’s rare hair off days are A- at worst. Most other players just look on in a combination of askance and envy.

    Leave a comment:


  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    Originally posted by Mel
    It's funny you mention this - I took two total newbs to the footy with me yesterday - they are Mariners members and had never seen an AFL game live or on tv. Apart from the hilarity that ensued from the actually genuine questions of "Why is the score 117?" (it was 1.1.7 ) and calls for players to be given a red card, they couldn't believe the amount of whistle-blowing that went on. At one time, it was commented "Oh, that 'ref' hasn't had attention in a while and had to blow his whistle". I'd previously tuned it out, but after that comment it drove me nuts how often the whistle was blown for the rest of the game.
    Yes, about the only time that I ever really noticed, just how incessantly umpires blow their whistles to award marks, was when I sat my young niece down to watch a game with me. Until she walked off because the whistling was driving her crazy, she was constantly asking why they were blowing their whistles and I was constantly replying that it was because it was a mark.

    Which is sort of interesting. If I can see that it's a mark, I pretty well never consciously hear the whistle, but if a whistle is blown when there isn't a mark, the whistling immediately enters my consciousness.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nico
    replied
    Originally posted by Go Swannies
    Agree. So is the call of touched. There were at least three cases when the ball was called touched and the player didn't clearly hear it - Luke Parker's was the most obvious. Imagine if that was in the noise of a GF.
    Talking of touched, Buddy's kick to Isaac on the edge of the square was about 13.5 metres. No commentator made any comment about the length of the kick.

    Leave a comment:


  • neilfws
    replied
    Enjoyed our day out at the footy. Got there early for the pre-match ceremonies. I found them quite moving and thought they were very well done. Held the kids' attention too.

    As to the game, close enough to be interesting without causing too much stress, we know Carlton just can't go for 4 quarters. For the Blues McKay was good - just outsized all our defenders. Also Cripps, and have to admit I enjoy watching Eddie Betts. Scored one of his trademark "impossible angle" goals right in front of us.

    Heeney was excellent and Buddy out-muscling 2 defenders for a goal was good to watch too. Tough day for McCartin but kept at it to his credit and still managed a few good strong marks. In fact I thought most of the players who were a bit "down" kept their heads up and toiled away.

    Good day out, solid enough win, onwards!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheBloods
    replied
    Originally posted by Agent 86
    Haha. Always, the way, hey?

    I'm sure they were saying exactly the same thing over at TalkingCarlton.
    Doubtful

    The baggers fans are sharing 5 brain cells around about 60k members they wouldnt know their arse from their mouth let alone the rules of the game !

    Leave a comment:


  • Agent 86
    replied
    Originally posted by TheBloods
    Anyone defending that one sided umpiring yesterday needs to get their @@@@@@@ eyes checked ! They were out to get us the minute we hit the front
    Haha. Always, the way, hey?

    I'm sure they were saying exactly the same thing over at TalkingCarlton.

    Leave a comment:

Working...